A lot of what needs to be done is making sure that the Harris win is large enough that you can’t easily claim that a handful of ballots should be tossed and change the outcome. That means:

  • Check your voter registration — part of the Republican strategy has long been invalidating registrations so people can’t vote
  • Volunteer — nothing in the world quite like talking to people.
  • Donate — money is used for everything from ads to voter turnout operations
  • Organize; be prepared to turn out with others in your community to actively object to any effort to ignore your votes
278 points

Okay, now hear me out. What if we treat them like traitors?

permalink
report
reply
153 points

America has rarely treated its traitors like traitors. That’s how we got in this whole mess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

It’s never too late to start!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Imagine if they dragged Prescott Bush out of his house in the middle of the night and strung him up.

We would literally be on a different. Fucking. Planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

TIL. From Wikipedia:

Prescott Bush

In July 2007, a BBC investigation reported that Prescott Bush, father of U.S. President George H. W. Bush and grandfather of then-president George W. Bush, was to have been a “key liaison” between the 1933 Business Plotters and the newly emerged Nazi regime in Germany, although this has been disputed by Jonathan Katz as a misconception caused by a clerical research error. According to Katz, “Prescott Bush was too involved with the actual Nazis to be involved with something that was so home grown as the Business Plot.”

Imagine your best defense is “I’m too much of a Nazi to be involved in petty things like a coup in the U.S. We’ll be speaking German soon enough anyway.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Entirely. Although it’s never too late to dig up his skull and start a secret society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Time to call the French!

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

We should make examples of them to deter future coup attempts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Indeed we should. The problem is that the last batch of Trump zealots who tried to help him illegally overturn the last election still haven’t actually even faced trial let alone been punished. The wheels of justice are turning so slowly, they might as well be standing still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There is no justice except what we make ourselves. The “system” is a distraction meant to placate the masses into thinking we’re living in a fair and reasonable society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Send them to Saudi Arabia since they seem to love their rule of law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I may not want their coup, but they have the same rights as any other citizen, including a speedy and public trial, and not being subject to cruel and unusual punishments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The right to a speedy trial is an absolute joke in this country. But in this case I’d like them to actually get it because it means they’ll be in prison faster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Is it cruel and unusual to exile them to a country that already has the system of government they’re trying to implement?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Tolerance goes both ways

Edit: for those downvoting. I’m saying fuck being nice to seditionist terrorists

permalink
report
parent
reply
166 points

Eh, there’s one additional way we can stop them. A landslide victory that puts her massively over the electoral college threshold would make a handful of compromised counties completely irrelevant.

permalink
report
reply
89 points

It will cast doubt on the election process regardless. This is very dangerous rhetoric, and unfortunately there’s about 20% of the country that wants this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

it’s important that nobody sinks into complacency even if harris’s victory is looking like an absolute blowout towards the end. GOP absolutely WILL do literally everything they can to undermine the election. everything from 2020 plus more

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

20% of the country are traitors and Trump put a good chunk of them in office.

Look at the supreme court. His appointees are going to fuck up our country for decades and there is no political will to deal with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Welp maybe it’s time then to drone the shit out of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

40%…we have really devolved as a country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I do think this is the only way. It’s not 270towin this year, we need a margin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Most people in America can’t do anything about that though. Only the people in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Nah. Even if you are in a safe state, vote. Even if you are in a state run by weirdos, vote. Literally vote.

It worked in 2020. trump had more votes than in 2016 and he lost by even more. January 6th had no chance of success because it was obvious who won. Taking the capitol building doesn’t mean anything.

The supreme court doesn’t even mean anything without the consent of the governed. The British won the War of 1812 and literally burned the White House to the ground. They still had to leave because the US is so big that it’s literally ungovernable without consent of the population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The British definitely did NOT win the war of 1812. Wtf are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What’s the electoral college threshold? I was wondering just recently if there’s any percentage of popular that matters more than the electoral college.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The number to reach is 270 EC votes. However, it is very possible to reach that number while not winning the popular vote. That’s why certain states (such as PA, GA, AZ) tend to be the “battleground” states as they have enough EC votes to shift the election and usually aren’t reliably red or blue.

If I remember correctly, it’s theoretically possible to win the Presidency of the US while only winning something like 25% of the popular vote (though in practice, if you’re able to win the states to pull something like that off you’re also going to be winning the bigger states as well so your victory would look more like Reagan’s).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Jesus Christ. If Trump won 25% of the popular vote and still became president, I hope it’d finally be enough to get the country to revolt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

270 total electoral college votes. No, the popular does not matter, just the 50 individual states. They distribute their electoral college votes in different ways, each state gets to set its own rules.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

That’s not in the cards given the last 4 years. Remember we only won in the wake of a mass uprising, with most people thinking they were voting to defund the police, defend Roe, free healthcare, less war, legalization of pot, freeing the concentration camps on the border, etc.

We’ll be lucky if Trump’s campaign shitting itself and Biden dropping out are enough to compensate for the last 4 years of either inaction or making things worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I don’t think people voted for Joe Biden for those reasons. Except maybe defend Roe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

I talked to a lot of people in 2020, the younger voters absolutely thought that’s what they were voting for. You underestimate how low-information the average american is. They associated free healthcare or defunding the police with democrats, and thought Biden was running on those things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

they’re neck-and-neck in the polls; how do you think that this will happen?

is it because you’re one of those people who disregard polls?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Polls are going to be skewed tpwards the people that answer the phone calls from random phone numbers flagged Spam or Political.

How many have called you this cycle? How many did you answer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

There’s prediction markets and bookies making odds as well. People putting money on the line are probably a little more accurate than polls by themselves. Looks like people think the odds currently favor Harris, but not by a large margin. 50.9% chance for Harris and 47.1% for Trump (https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2024/08/09/harris-has-vaulted-past-trump-as-the-bookies-favorite-to-win-presidential-election/). IIRC, prediction markets significantly favored Clinton in 2016 right before the results came back though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i’ve seen spam calls, but i’ve never seen political before and i suspect my demographic data will guarantee that i will never get a phone call from a poll worker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

HERE you go, buddy.

Everyone else, ignore polls, and just VOTE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

i don’t doubt that polls can be wrong; i asked my question because i was confused by the other poster’s position

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I take polls under advisement, though recent years have definitely demonstrated that there are issues with them. Regardless of their veracity, though, they are subject to shifting as time goes on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

they’re supposed to shift and that’s why it’s called polling; you’re taking action to measure that shift, if any/

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

No shit. They’ve only been saying it for years.

permalink
report
reply
33 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

I think the UN should send in independent observers to the US to oversee their elections because boy oh boy are those Republicans working hard to cheat.

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

I hear you but that just seems like putting kerosene on a fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It does seem so in every third world democracy, but it is the duty of US… Oh now I see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Watching Trump’s press conference from Mar-a-lago the other day, and hearing his excuses for why he isn’t out on the road campaigning, it struck me that the narrative that he’s moping around depressed that he’s losing isn’t the whole story.

He’s got Vance out pretending to campaign, while he and his buddies are sitting around coming up with plan B. He’s probably had calls with dozens of Republican governors and is getting teams of “alternate electors” together (the Stephen Miller interview on Ari Melber’s show made it pretty clear that they still see that as a perfectly legal strategy). Donald may know “it’s over” but that just means he’s going to get more desperate and we’ve already seen what desperate Trump can do with 2 months of prep, I’m not looking forward to seeing what he can do with 5 months.

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

I live in a mail in ballot state but I think people -especially in swing states with trump election officials- should call in sick to work on election day. Get some friends and be election observers. If you watch everything you’ll at least catch them in the act of whatever they’re planning. Bring water with you and help out. Even kids that can’t vote can do some things to help. Be an election volunteer if you can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Kids? Volunteering?

Headline: “ANTIFA openly recruits and grooms children in MIB States!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Vance

obligatory couch joke

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My crackpot theory is that he doesn’t actually want to win. I think he’s making so much money campaigning that he realized he could milk a couple more election cycles until the dummies get tired of him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Nah. You’re describing the DNC. The charges DJT is facing are real. He needs the immunity and the ability to shut down the prosecutions. Not to mention how much MORE grift is available for a sitting president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We know he needs the immunity, but I’m not sure he knows that. He’s dodged so many felonies at this point, he likely thinks he’s untouchable even if he loses. This is just speculation though, of course, based on my experience with my own maga family member’s tendencies to hand-wave away logic that makes them uncomfortable, especially when the topic is something that seriously affects them. You make some good points though. I think you’re right, but as I said, this is my loose crackpot theory xD

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If he could strike a deal with the courts, that he doesn’t get prosecuted for any of this crimes… he would happily lose. More money in playing the victim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly. Grift for another election cycle while you further beta-test defrauding the elections, count on dem’s to not be able to close whatever loopholes you find, swoop in with a winning election theft strategy with Ivanka in tow as cover for Trump Sr’s advanced age and hail her as a true (conservative!) woman that can handle the presidency (unlike the bad brown skank monster), then close the elections permanently with Trump Jr becoming VP when Sr finally passes. Mass Civil unrest occurs and Ivanka steps down to return leadership to a strong man that can truly lead with an iron fist through the ensuing Civil War in true fascist fashion.

Of course, they would never get away with all of that (because average Americans ARE good people, and there are plenty of good people fighting this possible future), but IMHO this is probably close to their best wet dreams.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is correct. They are not planning to win with votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 473K

    Comments