Kamala Harris gets it. Yes, we should fear Trump—but we should also mock him mercilessly, because it drives him nuts.

Donald Trump is in free-fall. Read this description from Sunday’s Washington Post of how the GOP nominee spent last week: “[A]ides did not want a situation where he was watching the convention every night, getting angry, and then just golfing all day and stewing, according to people who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private interactions. Trump also had grown annoyed with the news coverage that depicted him as not working as hard as his opponent, one person who talked to him said.”

If you didn’t know that the article was about Trump and you just read it cold without knowledge of the context, you might think it was a description of parents trying to figure out how to handle an ungovernable four-year-old. So they convinced Trump to get out of Bedminster and hit the road, trading suck-ups with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In the past, Trump has called Kennedy the “dumbest member” of the Kennedy family and a “radical left lunatic.” Kennedy has calledTrump a “terrible human being” and “probably a sociopath.”

188 points

It took them 8 years to realize what Thomas Jefferson found out in 1816

“Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.”

Bullies don’t like when you hit back because they base their power on the fact that they think you’re going to play by the rules while they’re free to break them. You so much as look like youre bending a rule and they’ll cry foul. Look at how Trump responded to Biden dropping out.

permalink
report
reply
75 points

“Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions.”

I’ve never heard that quote before, but I love it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Extra funny because Jefferson had plenty of unintelligible propositions himself, for which he was ridiculed while he was alive

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Like what?

(Not arguing, I just really need a refresher in colonial + early American history)

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I have taken to using my a quote of my own with people recently, on both sides in different situations. Quote: “Those who neither ascribe to nor participate in the social contract of tolerance are not afforded the protection it brings.”

I say it to the right when they complain about me calling them out on their BS or making it known that they are generally shit human beings.

I say it to the left when they try to call me out for saying that literal Nazis holding signs on the side of the road should have beverages thrown at them by passing cars at the tamest. I would prefer throwing much heavier objects, but the law protects them. The Law, not the social contract of tolerance. Within the confines of the law, people like that should not be tolerated and should be informed with as much force as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Arguing with someone, within the confines of the marketplace of ideas, about how the marketplace of ideas should be abolished, is a fools errand

If they refuse to even agree to the basic social ground rules of discourse whatever they have to say isn’t even worth entertaining

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bullies also only punch down. If they find out they’re not punching as far down as they thought they leave

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesn’t that also implying the 0 tolerance policy in schools for bullying would only help the bully? Cause I do agree

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I believe the zero tolerance rules do help bullies, they’re the ones who’ve made a habit of playing jussst outside the rules but with enough deniability that they can feign ignorance. Zero tolerance is great at catching people who don’t make a habit of breaking rules though. Teachers always seem to notice when the quiet one does something, but a bully being a bully is just another day for them. Been a long time since I was in school though so grains of salt and what not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

Well no shit, Sherlocks. Ever heard of “bully the bully”? Glad they’re finally catching on. Took too long.

permalink
report
reply
75 points

Trump had a known decades long overreaction to some reporter calling him a short fingered vulgarian when he ran in 2016.

Congrats on the Dems for finally using that to their advantage I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

When they eventually hit on what his father used to call him, hoo boy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

His father called him a short fingered vulgarian?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

> decades

> 2016

I am not sure that 8 years qualifies as decades

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

In an article from 2016 that makes the age clearer:

Nearly 30 years ago, Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair magazine, described Trump in Spy magazine as a “short-fingered vulgarian.”

The short fingered vulgarian quote is now almost 40 years old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Decades long? 2016 was approximately 0.8 decades ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The grudge had existed for decades in 2016. It didn’t start then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Bully the bully requires unity among their victims though, and if there’s one thing bullies do well, it’s sow discord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean, back in my country, I used to beat the shit out of the fuckers and they straighten up after that. Doesn’t work that way in the USA unfortunately. Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you’re talking at the schoolyard level, it definitely works in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the effective responses for bullies are either ignore or bully back

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

“The news is saying I don’t work as hard as my opponent. You know what I’ll go do? Golf some. That will show them how hard I work.”

Every time i have a dumb idea i just have to remember there is always a bigger idiot in the world. That always makes me feel better.

permalink
report
reply
73 points

Trump has been ridiculed the whole time. The only people who treat him as a serious candidate are his supporters and the media. That was true in 2015, that’s true today.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

That is not the impression I got as someone not from the US. I mostly saw scared and angry from democrats, and scared, angry or reverence from the news media. And that seems to be what he thrives on.

Ridicule came from stuff like the tv comedians and internet sources like YouTube… but these are easy enough to ignore.

Now that the ridicule is coming from the actual establishment, it cannot be ignored.

I find it very cool that the vile hatred, fearmongering and general dispicable behavior can be countered with joy, ridicule and a general cheerful demeanor.

Just the other day one of the GOP ghouls came out and actually said there is no joy… ROFL… they’re melting…

Now dial it up to 11 dems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, while there was mockery it didn’t come from ‘official’ sources. They called him serious names and didn’t ridicule him. They made it clear he was dangerous, but they also gave him respect like a serious candidate, contender, opponent, rival.

It probably would have worked from the beginning to just laugh at him, IF it was coming from the actual political establishment. If Clinton had essentially based her entire campaign around ‘hahah…oh wait you’re serious? Let me laugh harder.’ there’s a good chance he would’ve crashed and burned before ever getting off the ground, I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

But having Obama bringing in the size of it’s dick is somewhat of a new situation.

It hilarious and I am sure this does hurt little Donny deep into his heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You assume he has one to be hurt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

You’re right. He has been mocked the whole time, and mockery isn’t the determining factor.

He has simply played out his power arc. The same mockery that didn’t land before now lands, because he’s on the downside.

Populism depends on emotional support from the people, but if you don’t have a framework that actually meets the peoples’ needs (or is effective at controlling them) you just rise as the restless populace tries you, then fall as they toss you aside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Toxic masculinity always hates being laughed at. It’s that Margaret Atwood quote all over again. Too applicable when you consider complete abortion bans and project 2025.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments