The territorial violation by China is the latest in a series of events amplifying tensions between Beijing and Japan.

A Chinese military surveillance plane breached Japanese airspace off the country’s southwestern coast on Monday, marking what Japan’s defense ministry described as the first known incursion by China’s military into its territorial airspace.

According to a ministry official, a Chinese reconnaissance aircraft briefly entered Japanese territory near Nagasaki Prefecture around 11:30 a.m. on Monday. In response, Japan’s Self-Defense Force put fighter jets on high alert and issued a warning to the Chinese aircraft.

While Chinese planes frequently appear in international airspace around Japan, this incident represents the first confirmed entry of a military aircraft into Japan’s territorial airspace.

163 points

My reckless, irresponsible “solution” would be to just shoot ’em the fuck down. It’s a good thing I’m not in charge of Japanese border security. I’d probably start World War 3.

permalink
report
reply
88 points

Meh, Turkey shot down a Russian jet and nothing happened a handful of years back. Can you really be that mad when a fighter breaching protected airspace is shot down?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It’s not about “mad”, it’s about pushing boundaries. If they decide they want to…

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

it’s about pushing boundaries.

China is going to keep pushing boundaries until they get punched in the mouth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yes, you can.

Russia and Turkey have very different political dynamics than China and Japan.

Also, these types of airspace incursions, followed by intercepts, are pretty standard amongst major powers.

It doesn’t mean they’re benign, but that shooting down Chinese planes intentionally as a response, is something you do if you’re willing and ready for the escalation path to result in open conflict, not simply an escalation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whereas these airspace incursions are just… something you do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s Russia, they are getting invaded, and they started the invasion lmao, not sure if Chinese military is as bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I’ve got a better solution for you: wall of chain guns firing a curtain of giant bullets straight up all the time. All approved flights will be directed through the part of the curtain that’ll be reloading in sync with their breach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Is this the Simpsons approach? “I’m just going to fire my chain guns like this, and if you get shot down it’s your own fault!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Unfortunately, bullets fired straight up need to… come down. And the wind means it won’t always land in the same spot.

I still remember some idiot fired a pistol or something straight up at a local fireworks show a few years ago. A little boy died. It was really sad. I don’t think they ever found the guy who did it, either.

… I just googled it. That was ten years ago. Dang…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was going to ask how a pebble can kill with just terminal velocity, but it IS a rather pointy, metal and aerodynamic pebble.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean sometimes they didn’t even mean to be in your airspace, the instruments on the craft just went goofy and now they’re lost. It wouldn’t be cool to shoot someone down just because they don’t know where they are.

(Not saying this is what happened, just that it can happen)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How does GPS just “go goofy?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

"In a half mile, turn right…

At the MC Escher painting, take the next upside down left down the stairs."

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

GPS jamming and spoofing is like, a whole thing and isn’t even new tech at this point. Military grade nav doesn’t rely on GPS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
1 point

Ive seen a gps go nuts for no reason and decide that I am infact on the otherside of the county, and I live in a rather big county largest in the US actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That ought to be fun with all the border disputes. Some islands are claimed by 4 (well, 5) nations:

  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • North Korea (because they claim the south and all their claims)
  • Taiwan
  • China
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

russia has claims as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, in the north there are still disputes as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

My reckless, irresponsible “solution” would be to just shoot ’em the fuck down.

Reconnaissance aircraft are notoriously difficult to hit, due to their high altitude and high speed.

Firing a bunch of ordinance into the sky would just mean raining it back down on your own population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

The Y9 in question here though is slow, fat, and low - max speed of 360kn and a service ceiling of 10,000m. It’s a cargo plane with EW stuff on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

Then it seems like there’s a leap of logic between “cargo plane” and “reconnaissance aircraft”. Very possible it was just an inexperienced/behind schedule pilot cutting corners on the route.

Seems like a dick move to kill an entire plane full of people because someone decided to short-cut through your airspace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Reconnaissance aircraft are notoriously difficult to hit, due to their high altitude and high speed.

I mean, maybe in the 80’s? The technological advancements of SAM have basically made speed and altitude mean next to nothing. Now most things depend on being hard to pick up on radar, or like the plane in the article, are just large planes filled with electronic warfare equipment.

Firing a bunch of ordinance into the sky would just mean raining it back down on your own population.

This would have been over the Pacific…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

The technological advancements of SAM have basically made speed and altitude mean next to nothing.

Show me the American-made hypersonic air defense missile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This isn’t reconnaissance, it’s standard airspace incursion and intercept.

Everyone here seems to be a really hawkish as of late, or possibly just having a very poor understanding of international relations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Reconnaissance aircraft are notoriously difficult to hit

With exceptions for the United State’s top shelf stealth planes the Japanese are quite capable of shooting down anything flying in earths atmosphere. In the event that Japanese can’t do it the United States Aircraft Carrier Group assigned to Japan absolutely can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

the Japanese are quite capable of shooting down anything flying in earths atmosphere

Sure. Just put in a call to the Americans to do it for them.

Still not clear why anyone is shooting down Chinese cargo planes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Wheee.

But in seriousness, if China learned anything from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine it’s that military corruption is a bitch and you need way more equipment than you thought. I expect it’s posturing. Sun Tzu: when you’re weak, appear strong.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Why is China trying to piss off all its neighbors?

permalink
report
reply
22 points

So that they can attack Taiwan to “secure local allies” would be my incredibly uneducated guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Notice me nippon sempai UwU

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

At least this time they aren’t claiming most of the South China Sea and ramming Philippine fisherman boats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But they did just do this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I suspect they have something to gain by fueling a climate of geopolitical tension. Maybe they hope someone will turn to them because they’re scared?

I’m not sure what exactly but I’ve got a feeling we’re underestimating their intelligence when we say they’re just posturing or being silly.

But then again, several years ago people thought Trump and Musk had a plan and were just posturing as idiots while playing 4D chess. How wrong they were.

I may just be giving the Chinese government too much credit… But I’m leaning towards no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To provide a distraction for their domestic problems maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Damn that plane looks so much older than it is (2012). It looks like a C-130 had a baby with an ATR-72.

Edit: oh, it’s based on an An-12, no wonder!

permalink
report
reply
2 points
permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments