We have definitely been transported to an alternate universe

196 points

Really wild to see MTG appear to be on the correct side twice in a week. I wonder what the goal of the party is aside from distancing themselves from a losing candidate.

permalink
report
reply
170 points
*

I think she woke up and realized a government shutdown right before an election caused by ineffectual republican leadership might hurt them in the down-ballot. Or we woke up Sunday on the next timeline because the earth exploded, and everyone died Saturday night. It’s been a crazy week and it’s only Tuesday.

Edit: looks like a shutdown before the election due to ineffectual republican leadership is back on the menu boys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

I mean yeah that’s sound political strategy, but you’re telling me MTG woke up and possessed the self reflection necessary to realize that?

I think it’s more believable that we all died.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Me too lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Mitch McConnell made a statement of how stupid and damaging a shutdown would be for them. I would bet she is just listening to the wise turtle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Can confirm, am dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I think this is absolutely the correct interpretation of this. Shutting down the government because repubs don’t want to play ball weeks before an election is only likely to hurt their chances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Yeah but they do this every election year, and their supporters never care

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think you’re putting far to much faith in people willing to vote ®, their base would vote for them even as their families are sent to labor and death camps, while undecided and ‘independent’ voters will cast their ballot entirely on the last headline or 72 hours.

To me this reeks of Greene and other Magots realizing their wing of the party is imploding and will have to find a place in what ever GOP comes out the otherside of this election and the next midterm. Trump’s decline makes it pretty obvious they need someone else’s coattails to grab onto and rally around, so she’s trying to be the loudest voice in the room to be part of the new power structure if not the face of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

This is exactly it. Shutdowns are not popular, if they shutdown the gov before the election it is going to cost them significant votes. They are already worried about the impact of Trump on down ballot candidates, a shutdown will almost certainly cost them seats. This is MTG expressing her panic because she realizes how stupid the GOP is behaving with an election about to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

What surprises me the most is that out of all the Republicans, it’s her that realizes how stupid this is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Or she’s jealous that someone else is fucking Trump so she’s causing problems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Have we been absolved of Harambe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It makes logical sense for a person to draw this conclusion, but MTG is famously an idiot, so that’s what’s baffling. What convinced her to change her tune?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The checks stopped clearing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No way she is involved in the Russian election interference case and is trying to pull a tim pool

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I vote for this!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I SAW IT ON THE TV!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I must have slept through it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Putin said he wants Harris to win, she took that literally 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

haha. beautiful

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Putin consistently underestimates women. He was happy Hillary was secretary of state until she gave vocal support to the Ukrainian Revolutions in 2014 that ousted his puppet. He assumed CIA was pulling her strings or operating through her so tried to burn that bridge. Trump was a resounding failure at implementing long term policies to benefit Russia, so now he’s banking on Harris being passive in foreign policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

She might’ve been hit by a stray neutrino or something? Flipped a random bit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

LOL how many bits is MTGOS anyway…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

4

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

2-bit

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Is she trying to distance herself from the maga side of the party after seeing the polls predicting a big defeat this election?

Very strange to see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

My spitball theory is that she sees this new Loomer person coming to eat her lunch as token crazy maga lady, so she’s trying to get off her sinking ship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Loomer is Trump’s side piece

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Priority #1 is always to remain elected so that you can stay “on the take”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

She doesn’t want to miss a paycheck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Congress always gets paid. They’re “essential.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I wonder if there’s any way that could be changed by executive action? If the government gets shut down, Congresspersons don’t get paid. Their aides and support staff are essential because they do the real work, but they don’t get paid until they pass a budget…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

MTG hasn’t suddenly grown a ethocortical gland. She’s getting polling numbers that scare her, and she wants to win reelection. Georgia is turning purple for a variety of reasons, and a government shut down would be bad for her campaign.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

I haven’t seen polling specifically for her district but, while Georgia is very purple (and has been since like 2014), her district is gerrymandered to hell and back to not be anything other than red. I think I saw that it’s one of the deepest red districts in the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Deep red refers to voter registrations. It’s generally a very good indicator which was they will go, but this election is anything but politics as usual.

I’m not privy to her internal polling, but I’ll bet she saw numbers than people in her district are concerned about Trump, see a lack of leadership in the GOP, and are considering staying home rather than show up for her. Angry people show up to vote, and if enough people say they are going to vote Trump out, then she doesn’t want to be on his boat when it happens.

Another possibility is that she’s testing the waters for a Senate or Governor run in 2026. She doesn’t need to move towards the center if she can bash people to her right. It makes her look reasonable and conciliatory without actually being either one.

Either way, she’s not doing this because of principles. She’s doing it for personal benefit, because she’s a conservative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I’m sorry but, as a Georgian, I’m pretty sure she has a 0% chance of either losing her district or getting elected to statewide office, no matter what she does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The only danger MTG has in her district, as someone who lives right next to her district, is being primaried. She will never lose the general to a Democrat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Prologue or Act III?

permalink
report
reply
52 points

That was a great explanation.

I remember hearing an interview with John Boehner on NPR (former Republican Speaker of the House) a few years ago. He was talking about the government shutdown that happened shortly after far right wing was elected in 2010. Apparently, a few of them barged into his office after the shutdown and demanded to know why the government had actually shut down.

And Boehner was like, “Um…you said you wanted it to?”

And the right wingers said, “Well we didn’t think it would work!”

These are irresponsible people who think they should just get to play games in life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

And the right wingers said, “Well we didn’t think it would work!”

I recall a number of voters who voted in favor of Brexit who were interviewed and said things like “but I didn’t think it would actually happen!”

I also seem to recall a similar sentiment in a case where people voted to strip funding from a local library in Michigan, then were shocked when the library had to close.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

–Jean-Paul Sartre

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Wow. He really nailed it in a very simple way. Nice job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Jeff Jackson is amazing. He’s not my representative, but he’s running for state wide office(Attorney General, N.C.) this year. Don’t be surprised if you see more of him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’ll have my vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is this a video?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s a link to a video if that’s what you mean

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Weird must be the app because I just see a picture with a play button it that does nothing

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

She’s seeing the potential writing on the wall and is attempting to come across as moderate all of a sudden so that when the Republican party purge of MAGA begins, she can hopefully be overlooked by it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

This isn’t what she’s trying to do. Instead of trying to blend in with moderates, she represents a radical and extremist part of the party that she wants to paint as the true moderates in order to leverage the opinion of the republicans upon Trump’s reelection.

The stance of tearing down speakers of the house is not new, she has railed against every speaker of the house this term for not enacting her extremist policies. What she is doing is trying to force the republican party’s hand to become more extremist because they can’t get over the line to win anything as a party without the extremists supporting them.

I fear that many people don’t understand this move from her but it’s clear if you’ve been paying attention. The point is to sell out the rest of the party that does not side with her. Her philosophy is “MAGA party or no party” and she has a small group of 5-10 allies that also believe this. If Trump loses, the party splits along these lines. If he wins, this fascist group will suddenly represent the whole party. That’s the bet she’s making.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Her voter base of Joe Rednecks don’t have a passport, and stopped paying attention to the wherabouts of their birth certificate once it got them their first gun.

Voter suppression suddenly doesn’t feel so good, when it puts your seat on the line…

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Honestly this might not even be that far off. I could see a lot of people opposing requiring presenting documents to vote because they don’t want the government to be able to track them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Ah, that explains her sudden interest, however fleeting, in sanity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments