In the 1820s and 30s con man Gregor MacGregor claimed to be the “Cazique of Poyais”, basically the king of a thriving colony/country in central America that in no way existed. Investments in the entirely fictional country skyrocketed because of its vast amount of made up natural resources and its population of make believe servile and pleasant natives. MacGregor even convinced a few hundred Anglos to move to Poyais, gave them fancy titles in the military and civil service of his pretend country and then put them on ships to central America where they were dropped off in an uninhabitable jungle that MacGregor had no claim to whatsoever and then most of them died.

permalink
report
reply

Uncritical support for grifting anglos and leaving them to die of malaria.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Okay hear me out what if we did Fire Festival 3.0 but in Zemunda or Agriba?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Omfg he got away with it too.

When the British press reported on MacGregor’s deception following the return of fewer than 50 survivors in late 1823, some of his victims leaped to his defence, insisting that the general had been let down by those whom he had put in charge of the emigration party. A French court tried MacGregor and three others for fraud in 1826 after he attempted a variation on the scheme there, but convicted only one of his associates. Acquitted, MacGregor attempted lesser Poyais schemes in London over the next decade. In 1838, he moved to Venezuela, where he was welcomed back as a hero.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes, and when you see him referred to as “the general”, do I have some very surprising news for you about the vast majority of his military record!

permalink
report
parent
reply

There are too many aspects to his life story worthy of mention, torrenting a biography now. Thanks for linking a wild ride of a wikipedia article.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Upon deliberation, my favorite part:

He led the landing party personally on 29 June 1817 with the words: “I shall sleep either in hell or Amelia tonight!” The Spanish commander at Fort San Carlos, with 51 men and several cannon, vastly overestimated the size of MacGregor’s force and surrendered without either side firing a shot.

Spanish forces congregated on the mainland opposite Amelia, and MacGregor and most of his officers decided on 3 September 1817 that the situation was hopeless and that they would abandon the venture. MacGregor announced to the men that he was leaving, explaining vaguely that he had been “deceived by my friends.”

He turned over the command to one of his subordinates,** a former Pennsylvania congressman** named Jared Irwin, and he boarded the Morgiana with his wife on 4 September 1817 with an angry crowd looking on and hurling insults at him. He waited offshore for a few days, then left on the schooner Venus on 8 September.

Irwin’s troops defeated two Spanish assaults and were then joined by 300 men under Louis-Michel Aury, who held Amelia for three months before surrendering to American forces, who held the island “in trust for Spain” until the Florida Purchase in 1819.

Two weeks later, the MacGregors arrived at Nassau in the Bahamas, where he arranged to have commemorative medallions struck bearing the Green Cross motif and the Latin inscriptions Amalia Veni Vidi Vici (“Amelia, I Came, I Saw, I Conquered”) and Duce Mac Gregorio Libertas Floridarium (“Liberty for the Floridas under the leadership of MacGregor”).

He made no attempt to repay those who had funded the Amelia expedition.

Press reports of the Amelia Island affair were wildly inaccurate, partly because of misinformation disseminated by MacGregor himself.

Imagine what this man could do social media.

Oh, and he his born shortly thereafter was named

spoiler

Gregorio, Gregor MacGregor fathered Gregorio MacGregor

permalink
report
parent
reply

If you want to have some fun, look back on the total population of Scotland at the time and do some math and realize that percentage-wise this is the equivalent of convincing about 72 000 Americans to move to Poyais today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“Name MacName” is perfect for a con artist

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s almost the greatest Scottish name of all time, but that honor belongs to Marmaduke Thweng

permalink
report
parent
reply

That dude has a wild life story lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply

Oh yes, well worth reading up on. The Poyais scheme is just one chapter in the life of one of the most impressive liars to ever live.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I feel like I’ve been given the opposite gift, never being able to convince anyone of anything and in fact only hardening their shitty beliefs

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Cw: animal abuse

If someone was trying to sell an old or sick horse and pass it off as younger or healthier they’d cut the skin off a finger of ginger and put it in the horse’s butt. The burning and discomfort would make the agitated horse seem more active and energetic than it really was.

I don’t know how you could relate that to bitcoin but they are both scams.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

I read "finger of a ginger, and was like damn, bad time to have ginger hair

permalink
report
parent
reply

I forgot all about figging, except I had never heard of people doing it to horses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

But yours isn’t a pyramid scheme

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Point.

What if we trained the horses to water-ski and had them stand on top of each other. In a pyramid?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You win!

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

dutch tulip mania?

permalink
report
reply

That is more of an NFT analog. Instead of apes with different accessories, you had tulips with slightly different coloration on their petals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Yeah, its called the South Sea Bubble

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Ooh that’s a good one, it has the ponzi scheme aspect and the speculation aspect. And people would know it’s not real but put money in it anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Nah, I think bitcoin deserves credit for being a new type of scam. It’s not a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme or multi-level-marketting scheme. It’s most similar to a series of pump and dump scams, but it’s more different from those than pyramid schemes are from MLMs, which get separate names.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’d definitely call any cryptocurrency a pyramid scheme. A few whales at the top hold the majority of the value. They trade between themselves to simulate market activity, but their value only comes from others buying in. The currency doesn’t achieve any actual promises, so the only way those early adopters see any value is if more buy in. At each stage the pool becomes larger for a smaller share of the asset and profit.

They all have the exact same culture and rhetoric of any mid-level marketing company. That’s the model driving it to attract the same kind of person with the same promise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m pretty sure the history of money and bank notes is full of people doing similar things with bitcoin. We’re just used to a relatively mature banking industry that only operates scams through dozens of layers of indirection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Niall Ferguson wrote a good book about money in modern (post-Reformation) history. He sets out to prove that financialization is the foundation of human progress, gets caught in currents that seem to prove something quite the opposite, and then ends by restating the hypothesis with none of the rest of the book backing it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Idk it sounds similar to Dutch Tulip bubble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

the purpose of a system is what it does

permalink
report
parent
reply