A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

118 points

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

He wasn’t giving me material for my viewers, so I kept annoying him until he shot me! Why is this my fault?!

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Not annoying, threatening. Advancing despite being told to stop repeatedly is a threat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

What a douche bag

permalink
report
reply
-44 points

Love how this comment suits both actors in this little play.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If you’d read the article you’d know the shooter was extremely justified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

I hope Colie goes free and I hope Cook gets sued for everything he has. I don’t know what you’d sue him for, but find something before he gets someone actually killed.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

I think getting shot is punishment enough, but Cook should at least be banned from posting anymore pranks to his YouTube. They should really shut down his YouTube channel if we’re being honest and nothing of value will be lost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Apparently it wasn’t.

Cook said he continues to make the videos

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

An excellent example of why a weekly range day is important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If it didn’t even deter the guy or make him think twice… I think that’s string evidence no crime was committed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Pain and emotional suffering is always available. If he pressed charges then all of his legal fees as well. The lost wages from being locked up… etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points
*

Fuck all that. Attitudes like that are why Americans think they can just blast away. You won’t see my pistol until I’m certain killing you is my very last resort. And if I pull it, it’s because I mean to use it.

Did this idiot think his life was in danger from an annoying man with a cell phone, in the middle of a fucking food court?! No. He used his gun as a “get off of me” tool. He’s damned lucky Cook survived.

EDIT: I seriously hope some of you people do not conceal carry. The comments here are terrifying and completely ignorant of case law, attitudes comprised only of feels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

So you’re going to wait until you’re hit/shot to try and pull your gun out?

The only more escalatory thing the YouTuber could have done is actually hit the guy. This is exactly when you need to have your gun out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

The aggressor was a loud-mouthed bully in a very public place. I’ve dealt with these assholes since elementary school in the 70s. They’re cowards, one and all. Perhaps such behavior is more threatening to younger folks? I gather kids don’t get their ass beat on the regular in school any longer? In any case, I think I would have instantly known what I was looking at.

Also, seems the bully didn’t speak any “fighting words”, and that may be key. OTOH, Virginia holds no duty to retreat. Feels like thin legal ice for the shooter.

And no, I’m not giving him the chance to hit me. I’m hyper aware of my ability to draw. If I felt that option was about to be taken from me? Yeah, that almost certainly would have crossed the line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He could very well think that. One friend of mine gets a fraid for his saftey if protest is in the area. I have scared the shit out of people by just walking near them.

Now in the era of mass shooting would i be afraid that some ahole came up to like would i think this is a prelude to getting shot. I might honestly think that

permalink
report
parent
reply

Agree. Even under the broadest, natural law justification for self defense, this wasn’t self defense. The dude had no basis to conclude his life was in danger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Lmao. Cops shoot people who just ignore them and get a vacation. This guy has a stranger in his face suddenly who won’t leave him alone and keeps getting closer despite repeated commands not to and you think he has no right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Seems these people are forgetting this was in a, presumably crowded, food court, and not a dark alley. Shooter is on very thin legal ice, very thin.

Also, seems some of these folks don’t have experience with the garden variety bully. This wasn’t some madman running up on the shooter, this was a bigger guy clearly trying to get a reaction.

If the aggressor had spoken any “fighting words”, and yes that’s a legal term, I might well have shot him. That does not seem to have been the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

These prank channels should be completely demonetized to remove the incentive of doing stupid shit like this in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

No shit curse first 10 seconds get demonetized. Terrorize some one and you can earn 3k a month. YouTube should remove his channel and if they don’t get fucking sue to for allowing the content.

Fucking shooter a hero and stood his ground prankster should apologize and be greatful he isn’t dead.

Because as any train gun owner knows your not supposed to pull your gun unless it shoot to kill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

While I agree the YouTube kid kind of got what was coming to him, the shooter isn’t a straight up hero.

As annoying as this kid was it doesn’t sound like he ever touched the guy. I would completely understand the shooter shoving, punching, or even using mace/taser on the YouTube guy, but jumping straight to shooting someone over that is just a bit unhinged behavior, at least in my opinion.

I am not against CCW or self defense or anything, but the shooter definitely went overboard, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he is found guilty in the court case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, weird take that annoying somebody or even getting up in their face is grounds for execution. Get security, get the cops, whatever. They weren’t in any danger. They were just scared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*

What is in the water in Virginia? The video should have killed this case dead. Continuing to advance after being commanded to stop is literally a text book self defense case. Especially when you add in the delivery driver job (one of the most dangerous jobs in the US for violent robbery and car jacking) and the specific intent to disorient and confuse.

That’s tailor made to elicit a fight or flight response in any reasonable person.

(Before anyone asks for statistics, delivery drivers make up 1/5th of US work place fatalities according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics)

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Yeah I do believe in a duty to retreat but if I saw someone workshopping ways to confuse me with a group of people and refusing my demands to stop harassing me, while they advanced in a bizarre fashion I’d be looking for a clear path to retreat and reaching for my knife. That behavior is unpredictable, invasive, and demonstrates refusal to respect pearly stated boundaries. I’m not one of those paranoid people who doesn’t go anywhere without a gun or anything but there’s no way I’d feel safe in that scenario. I wouldn’t even consider that YouTube prankster is a job some people have, I’d be much more afraid he’s going for my purse or worse.

And as for the lack of fear, yeah every self defense lesson I’ve had has taught to show no fear nor aggression, you firmly demand the aggressor to back away while looking for an out by which to flee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah I’ve seen people talk about that like the driver somehow pre-meditated the shoot. But it’s actually just a sign of good training on thinking through the adrenaline.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 525K

    Comments