702

contempt of rule(lemmy.blahaj.zone)

posted
by
Avatar
(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
in
Avatar
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
79 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
4 points
*

That doesn’t make sense, a “browser spoofing” addon most certainly doesn’t do anything that would be detectable by an ISP listening in on your encrypted connections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
6 points

Amazon is not an ISP though…? In this scenario, Amazon Prime Video is a server that is receiving a series of HTTP requests. User agent spoofing absolutely would work in that scenario.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
0 points

I don’t think they were talking about Amazon

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
superkret@feddit.org
7 points

Only problem is streaming services like Amazon that purposefully limit the quality on Linux.

Literally the comment they replied to.

permalink
report
parent
reply

196

!196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

other rules

Community stats

  • 7.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 199K

    Comments

Community moderators