You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
72 points

Biden has been a fine president, but notably failed to do a number of things that are important to me such as legalizing marijuana, codifying into law RvW, ending Citizen’s United, increasing the minimum wage, etc. I like Joe Biden, and he’s way better than the other guy, but I wouldn’t say “great”.

permalink
report
reply
112 points

The President cannot unilaterally do any of those things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

And the things he could do unilaterally (student loan forgiveness), he absolutely tried to do , but was cockblocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Absolutely. I mean, it’s utterly fascinating that people think the President can somehow overturn a Supreme Court decision (Citizens United). The civic literacy in this country is fucking awful, and it’s clear that a huge portion of our electorate doesn’t know or understand anything more complicated than a one-line soundbyte.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Same with Marijauna, one of the first things he did was call for rescheduling by the DEA who have been too busy masturbating in corners. He did, however, pardon a ton of people over weed offences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Drug schedules are set by the FDA. The FDA is part of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Department of Health and Human Services is part of the executive branch of the US government. The executive branch is headed by Biden. Short of just waving his hand and magicking the drug classification away, there is still a lot he could do to make it legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you cant hold him accountable for not getting minimum wage increase because he can’t do it unilaterally why give him credit for things he cant do unilaterally, like the infrastructure bill? Clearly he didn’t do that unilaterally either so why should he get credit? You can’t have it both ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The President can’t reschedule marijuana?

edit:

The Congressional Research Service seems to think he could:

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10655

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not enabling genocide, so he can make up procedural nonsense to avoid doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

“Reschedule? Ok, tomorrow evening it is.”

- Dark Brandon

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s astonishing to me the supposed number of “informed” people with their moral purity on Lemmy don’t know basic US civics. But hey trendy nicknames worked for the low intelligence maga voters no reason it doesn’t work on them. Maybe they’ll realize it when Trump takes power again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Proceedings to add, delete, or change the schedule of a drug or other substance may be initiated by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or by petition from any interested party, including:

The manufacturer of a drug

A medical society or association

A pharmacy association

A public interest group concerned with drug abuse

A state or local government agency

An individual citizen

Not quite unilateral, but seems like he could lean a bit on Becerra and get the re/de-scheduling started. Congress handed that authority to the executive branch years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahsinclair/2024/01/18/dea-considers-rescheduling-cannabis-what-this-means-for-us-and-global-reform/?sh=1ee5279b743f

That is happening, maybe slower than any of us want ( and honestly probably time a bit to help in the election), but the rescheduling process had begun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Railroad Union was all him. He can raise the minimum wage of federal workers, contractors, and sub contractors. He could have ended the Remain in Mexico program. He could have set the DOJ to monopoly breaking. He could have stopped supplying Israel. He could direct HUD to begin buying housing for direct rental programs…

The list goes on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

He can raise the minimum wage of federal workers, contractors, and sub contractors.

Done. Oh wait.

He could have ended the Remain in Mexico program.

Done, and confirmed by SCOTUS.

He could direct HUD to begin buying housing for direct rental programs…

Done.

So let’s rewrite your comment, given the things that you apparently didn’t know actually happened:

The Railroad Union was all him. He raised the minimum wage of federal workers, contractors, and sub contractors. He ended the Remain in Mexico program. He could have set the DOJ to monopoly breaking. He could have stopped supplying Israel. He directed HUD to begin buying housing for direct rental programs… The list goes on…

Yeah, it has a slightly different flavor when you actually…you know…pay attention to things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

On top of Edward Teach’s comment, you also raised the issue of the railroad union. Guess what?

https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

Biden did the right thing once again, and also managed to avoid a national logistics disaster. Please stop operating off of vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can’t he just sign executive action after executive action and ignore the court like Jackson did?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Don’t forget railroad buster Biden and Israel apologist Biden.

Still better than “million American deaths due to incompetence and pushing psuedo-science” trump though, don’t get me wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Keep in mind, the Biden administration continued to negotiate on the unions behalf until the companies capitulated and gave sick days. The rail unions celebrated the victory and gave Biden credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The rail unions celebrated the victory and gave Biden credit.

There is a huge difference between union leaders and what they say on behalf of it’s members and the rank and file members themselves. Kneecapping rank and files power, their only power which is to withhold their labor, is not something that is celebrated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Railroad Union buster… People might think he actually broke up the oligopoly on the rails.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The executive can’t make laws. Only congress can do that. And right now that means for those things to happen, Democrats have to control the House and 60+% of the Senate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Or they have to be willing to use a simple majority to get rid of the filibuster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

They don’t have the guts because the 2024 senate election landscape doesn’t look great for Dems. Most of the purple seats that are up for reelection have democratic incumbents. Traditionally that would mean that Democrats will lose seats. They don’t want to hand republican candidates in these states the talking point of “authoritarian democrats” killing the filibuster with a 1 seat majority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

None of those things are the responsibility of the President.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

All those things have to be done through Congress. If he had the majority to do it and didn’t do it, that would be a good reason to hold it against him.

If we want Congress to act we need to make sure he has the House and the Senate, and best to do it is to vote in upcoming election and make your friends and family to do the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We had a majority in congress. But that majority was Democrats, so they found the no votes to maintain the status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They didn’t really, they had a majority in the House, and not in the Senate, in 2022 things reversed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was really really really hoping Gerrymandering would be a key issue for his administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He set Harris on that issue early on, which is basically code for “it’s not a priority, will probably fail, and I don’t want to be associated with failure”. Which was kind of self fulfilling, because the VP just doesn’t have the stature to strongarm anyone into a reform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Then vote Democrat across the board. He needs a majority in both the House and Senate for some of those, and a super majority to go against the Supreme Court afaik.

Voting matters. If you want results, Biden needs the numbers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Joe Biden is trapped in the White House. The Republicans refuse to let him out unless he pardons Donald Trump and let him be president. He needs your help but we can help him stop the Republicans from taking over the country.

All he needs is the 16 digits on the front of your mom’s credit card, as well as the 3 digits on the back but you must hurry, he doesn’t have much time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

You mean like all those other times Democrats had majorities and, checks notes, delivered milquetoast Republican bills?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You mean that one time for 3 months during Obamas term, where they were focused on trying to get Healthcare reform in? Because there’s no other time in recent history where the dems controlled both houses with a dem potus

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t “like” him at all, but I can acknowledge that he’s done a great job.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 315K

    Comments