19 points
*

Hamas has banned the digging of wells since 2021. I don’t see how they would permit the harvesting of rainwater, even if there weren’t Israeli legal regulations in place (which seem to be on par with many other countries’ laws). That plus their systematic dismantling of working water infrastructure for rocket parts has had it’s effects.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

Yeah, but they banned it as a bad way to deal with a water shortage problem. Israel banned it because they are pricks.

Many rural areas with Palestinians, including Palestinian citizens of Israel, aren’t even covered by the Iron Dome system because they are registered as an empty area. They also don’t get basic infrastructure that Israel would otherwise provide to any illegal settlement right away.

That would make Hamas even dumber as bombing Israel would mean a large number of unintercepted missiles will fall into areas where Palestinians live.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Illegal settlement. Wow. Just wow. This says a lot about health of democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Basically, both Palestine and Israel hate Palestinians

What a beautiful world we live in…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, Putin hates Russians and Sobyanin hates Moscowians. Not a surprise to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The United States does the same thing all over the Southwest. Rural people will tell you.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

There’s a difference between needing a permit to collect rainwater because the water belongs to everyone, and being forbidden from collecting rainwater because the water belongs to an oppressing party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

isn’t the point there that shit is super dry and if you leech the water in the wrong places the ground can’t handle it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It might be the same as Canada where you only can with a permit just to be sure people aren’t drinking mold water

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d guess it’s for droughts

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
52 points

“Rain is the property…”

Wow.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Ye, Israel do be taking the Nestle stance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points
*

Given the context, this seems more evil than is probably intended.

There are laws about collection and storage of rainwater all over the world unrelated to genocide. Water falling from the sky is the source of aquifers, lakes, and rivers that are important for everyone.

permalink
report
reply

The context is very straightfoward. It is an occupied territory. The occupier claims ownership of natural ressources in the occupied territory. This is typical imperialist behaviour and illegal under international law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There are laws about collection and storage of rainwater all over the world unrelated to genocide.

I never seen them before. Too much rainwater is a problem, but not collecting it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s illegal for me to have rain barrels off my gutters. I wanted them to use the water for my garden. I’m not in any area with existing water shortage or drought issues either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It can be actually. People upstream of water sources - often wealthy people with land but sometimes a collective of local farmers - build dams or retaining ponds to save the water for themselves and on a significant scale can limit the amount of water that goes downstream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

To add what others said (like Israel making up rules for Palestine), the people of Palestine are being attacked and their infrastructure targeted. It is pretty evil to destroy the water supply and then say: “but you can’t get it elsewhere :)”.
I don’t think this is necessarily the case here, but laws like this are often an attempt to offer the appearance of legitimacy to acts of violence (i.e. “yes we imprisoned them but they broke the law!”).

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Water for agricultural and domnestic use usually is fed back to the water cycle, though.

Watering my veggies is distinct from e.g. building a dam, or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You could, though, for example, set up a large collection system for water that would normally be fed into a tributary that other farmers are using downstream for irrigation. A company with enough resources to collect and bottle rainwater for profit across a large area that would otherwise feed into aquifers could bleed a small farming community dry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wouldn’t call that “domnestic or agricultural” use anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh I think it’s meant to be just as evil as it looks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

and who better to claim ownership over the rain falling on palastinian soil than the israeli government

i dont think you can justify this stuff, at best make it sound slightly less evil

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Yeah there are good reasons to limit or prevent rainwater collection in order to preserve necessary river systems or agricultural areas etc.

However I highly highly doubt anything good faith is going on here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

AFAIK, there is no such laws in Europe. I know for parts of USA and Israel. Correct me if I am wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You are definitely wrong. I work in municipal development and a developer retaining water on site beyond what is necessary to offset their increased impervious cover is something that’s highly discouraged and restricted.

Water need to go to the rivers and aquifers, and damming it up for private use is a real problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No such laws in Russia. And it seems no such laws in Poland. No for Ukraine, no for Belarus, Kazahstan even has some bonuses if you collect rainwater, Latviya has some bonuses too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

https://youtu.be/QZkSRlIs9o0?si=l7jYk8g92oIS4t3b

The evil part is having laws like this and then filling in their water sources with concrete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/QZkSRlIs9o0?si=l7jYk8g92oIS4t3b

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It makes more sense to limit the amount of water collected than to outright banning it tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sometimes.

I work in municipal development and how rainwater is handled is a huge part of my job. It usually comes down to whatever the developer wants is bad.

They either want to collect all water and essentially deny it to everyone else so they can sell it, or they want to pave over everything and refuse to detain stormwater and flood the neighbors.

It’s not at all the same thing as Palestinians wanting water for food and crops, but a lot of the time these laws start out as something sensible before being used as a weapon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What do you mean by “makes more sense”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

The problem here is that the Palestine people aren’t being given control of their water.

permalink
report
parent
reply