127 points

What an incredible time and labor intensive fetish. No kink shame though. You do you, chart-making cousin fucker.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

I mean, can you really say for all practical purposes you’re related if Joe Bob is both of your great great great great uncles? After so many generations it ceases to be relevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

More than second cousins and it’s pretty irrelevant anyway. If they’re the same ethnicity as you there’s a good chance you’re some sort of cousins anyway. (Well humanity had a common ancestor so EVERYONE is kinda your cousin, eh)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t think anyone can really saying is you both of you are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It isn’t work if it excites you

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You chart-making, cousin-fucking, low down son of a bitch. Had to put that after it came into my head.

But yea, who gives a shit really. I’ve got cousins I’d fuck given half a chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Um

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

Fun fact: if you fuck anyone, you’re fucking your cousin.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Unless they’re closer than a cousin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

0th cousins

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Well, still technically your cousin, but also close family tie, moving them beyond cousin status. Like everybody is a quadrilateral, so you are fucking another quadrilateral, but it gets weird when rectangles or squares start fucking the same shapes when their family tree is all just rectangles or squares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

My wife is literally from the other side of the world… So now you have me wondering who our last common ancestor could be and how many degrees removed we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

My wife and I both have Scottish ancestry. Turns out there’s a chance a clan I descended from may have nearly genocided a clan she descended from, and if they had completed the job back in the day there’s a good chance she wouldn’t have been born. A few from her clan were let go to spread the word to others to not fuck around, and she’s descended from one of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Brutal. Her clan’s still being fucked generations later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Did you apologize?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
3 points
*

Lol, that actually sounds like fun to investigate, and i’m a bit jealous. My SO and I both have family that lived in rural Arkansas up until the early-to-mid 1900s. We stopped asking questions after we discovered that because we don’t want to end up having to ask how close is too close. We’re definitely not 2nd cousins or anything, and it’s doubtful that our respective “rural Arkansas” is the same place. But my grandfather was an orphan, so that side of the family tree is particularly murky…

Oh! Only tangentially related, but I have a second cousin out in Alabama who married her step-brother. They didn’t become step-siblings until they were in their late teens, so it’s not like they grew up together (well, not anymore so than kids the same age in a small town), but still… Roll Tide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

True, but considering I’m Jewish as far back as we can trace and there are no Jews in her ancestry as far back as she can trace, we’re pretty distant cousins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s exactly how I feel too man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Not if you go full Alabama or Oedipus or Electra (complex)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Your 0th cousin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

i wonder what percentage of people understand that all living things on earth share a common ancestor.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Not enough.

I was fortunate enough to sit through an impromptu family tree debate after I had been made aware that to some degree we are all related.

I lack the words to adequately describe the reactions of shock and horror when people who had been married for decades suddenly realized they shared real and somewhat close blood relation, some times only two or three generations apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

People in small towns especially, go back only a couple generations and they all start merging. Then they act shocked our town of <5000 people is all related

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

80,000 people in my town and the risk is still pretty serious

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This might be a really dumb question, but is it possible that any two human beings don’t share a common ancestor? Like, do we all link back to a single bacteria or were there multiple “made” at once?

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

There is a genetic Adam and Eve. However, I don’t think they existed at the same time. These were humans, not just apes/mammals/animals/bacteria. We are all distantly related.

We are also more related to mushrooms than trees are to mushrooms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Yeah, it’s hard to pin down when these common ancestors lived precisely, especially given that as portions of our genome go extinct, the common ancestor will change.

But Y-chromosomal Adam is estimated to have lived around 200,000 years ago, while estimates for when Mitochondrial Eve lived are a bit more recent, around 150,000 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

A quarter of us trace back to one mongol, fairly certain there’s going to be a point we all tie together to the same ape eating magic mushrooms in what would become Africa. Long ass time ago though

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No, all humans share a common ancestor, as does all multicellular life. Google clades for more info.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

With how funky micro organisms are with sharing DNA I’m not sure it matters. I’ve heard it likened to the genetic tree turning into a bush instead whare it’s a big mes of sharing of DNA across species.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That doesn’t mean fucking someone that close to you doesn’t come with risks.

But as long as it’s not multigenerational it’s a very small increase to the already small percentage of defects.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

If it required charts to explain and took years to work out then I’m guessing it probably wasn’t first cousin’s, and may not have even been second cousins. By the time you are at that level the risk is probably barely different than picking someone from the same country as you at random.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Could be a case of a long lost uncle

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And…? What are you saying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

banjo music

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
26 points

What a glorious day to be literate

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nope. That’s it.

I’m doing another flood. No ark this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

if you put the two together in a cylinder, will they form distinct layers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think if you put the two together you make a sort of 1990’s album cover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Specifically Metallica’s Load/ReLoad albums

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My girlfriend and I called it a strawberry swirl.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To the lab!

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

“The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.”

The saying (basically) means “the bond with the friends you make is stronger than happenstance family”.

Remember, don’t be bullied by family members who use “family” as their excuse to get you to do what they want without consideration of your own thoughts or feelings.

Happy Thanksgiving!

permalink
report
reply
28 points

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_is_thicker_than_water

Two modern commentators, author Albert Jack and Messianic Rabbi Richard Pustelniak, claim that the original meaning of the expression was that the ties between people who have made a blood covenant (or have shed blood together in battle) were stronger than ties formed by “the water of the womb”, thus “The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb”. Neither of the authors cite any sources to support their claim.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Neither of the authors cite any sources to support their claim.

“Just trust me, bro.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 813

    Posts

  • 39K

    Comments