Someone pls explain?
i believe it’s just pointing out the misalignment of the graphic. people may be under the impression that something like a cursor has mathematically precise proportions, but it does not.
And it’s by design. Because if it was absolutely precise the edge wouldn’t have been straight
https://www.makeuseof.com/windows-default-cursor-why-asymmetrical-tilted/
yeah it has kind of an optical balance to it. i don’t mind that it’s not mathematically perfect because it appears proportional. optics are all that matters, especially in pixel art.
(edit: i guess ‘pixel art’ isn’t correct anymore because it’s a vector graphic, but it used to be pixels!)
That doesn’t explain why the tail doesn’t aim at the point, it just explains why the cursor is tilted to the side.
So gay!
God damn it
What the fuck, I will never look at things the same way again.
Breeze (KDE) cursor forever!
I don’t really like the breeze cursor, it’s just the oxygen one but flattened and it doesn’t look as nice.
I have to say the “everything flat” was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best. Not sure what that is, at least from screenshots KDE looked worse than Windows XP/7
I have to say the “everything flat” was kind of a weird process. I think it looks better than in the old chaotic days. But something in between is best. Not sure what that is, at least from screenshots KDE looked worse than Windows XP/7. Now Windows 11 looks better than KDE, time for some new icons!
I’m so confused by the one person replying to you with 5 slight variations of the same comment…
