-4 points

Watching it with wife and son. Havenā€™t seen it in 20 years. Read books as kid.

Only 45 minutes in and we could barely make ourselves stop (bed time).

That said, I never bothered to finish the 3rd book and I donā€™t remember the 3rd movie. Turned into a typical war film/book from what I recall. Little interest to me.

I hope my memory is wrong.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Your memory is wrong and your username is ostentatious. No-one needs more than four pant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Turned into a typical war film/book from what I recall. Little interest to me.

What? Iā€™m honestly doubting you ever read Tolkien at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How DARE you question a 38+ year old vague memory/impression! So offended! šŸ˜‰

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points
*

But Lord of the rings is a modern movie?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

To me, modern says more about the techniques and methods used. In that respect, not much has changed even though 25 years has passed. Even stylistically it is more similar to a current film than one filmed 25 years before its release, i.e. mid 1970s. As someone else said, contemporary is a better word for describing its age than modern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Tbh you could argue the techniques created for the lotr films set the standard for the current era of filmmaking

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Props and makeup instead of full cgi?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I mean it was filmed 25 years ago, I guess it depends on your definition of ā€˜modernā€™

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Filmed 25 years ago

I donā€™t want to believe thisā€¦

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Quarter of a century ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Can confirm. I was an extra in these movies and now Iā€™m on first name terms with all the local osteopaths.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Made in the current millennium.

Oh fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
171 points

Is a movie that came out 23 years ago still modern?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Weā€™ve got a turd in the punch bowl

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Yes, the word we are searching for is contemporary. Technically all films are modern, but not contemporary. Though modern has expanded definition to include it generally as well but I like to explore language :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
229 points

Hey, fuck you

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

The perfect comment doesnā€™t exiā€¦

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I saw it on the classic movie channel yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I guess itā€™s time for me to find a nice, cool porch to die under.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It came out after ~1800, so yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I think by modern, they mean post-2010

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

What do you mean? Of course it isnā€™t a modern movie, it was filmed during the Third Age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Iā€™d say most of the time itā€™s an age thing the younger we are the easier impressed/amazed we are. growing older makes us sometimes cynical sometimes overloaded with imagery. The more youā€™ve seen the harder it gets to be impressed by stuff, cause you have seen so much. And we keep fond memories of the things we liked as kids and teenagers.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Thatā€™s also why it feels like the older you are the faster time passes. Life gets monotonous for you so all the days just blend in together and time feels like itā€™s flying. Youā€™ve seen a lot youā€™ve done a lot and stuff just sorta stops being as impressive as it was when you were a child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh yeah, when youā€™re younger thereā€™s so many firsts: first day of school, first crush, first kiss, first bf/gf, first dance, etc etc etcā€¦ the older you get, the fewer and further these benchmarks get. Still stuff like marriage, kids, career moves, house (lol maybe), but most of the time you grind work and fall deep into a routine.

Gotta keep shaking it up with travel and trying new things so itā€™s not a hot boring blur. Iā€™m hitting mid 30ā€™s but I swear I was mid 20ā€™s like a minute ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yea Iā€™m 30 and Iā€™m feeling it. I thought my 20s were lasting a long time but here we are, they ended and Iā€™m almost 31 now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

ā€œModern moviesā€

permalink
report
reply
0 points

ā€œContemporaryā€ would have been better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Theyā€™re all basically just talkies

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ancient Roman movies were better. Western society has collapsed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They did a damn good job with Spartacus

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I prefer clay etchings

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

This is how I felt when I tried to watch Rogue One. Itā€™s part of one of my favorite franchises yet it is also an entire feature length film without one single character in it who I give a shit about.

Itā€™s maddening.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

Thatā€™s why it was so great. It wasnā€™t about the hero punching people in the face whilst an army of troopers consistently fail to shoot them, or destiny babies failing upwards towards success.

This was a movie about normal people. Nameless people who were all parts of a whole, an orchestra of concerted effort to overcome the insurmountable. Some of them were in it for the ideal, but most of them were just in it to keep the person next to them alive. No one will sing their praises, and they donā€™t expect anyone to, as none of them expected to see the light of day.

It was one of the most humanist movies Iā€™ve seen in a long time, universe be damned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Rogue One was better than most of the drivel Disney has put out. Thank god there were finally some new characters. anitnal revolves around the same 3 fucking families.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I actually did enjoy Andor a lot. That was why I tried watching Rogue One again, since I thought I might like it better with the added context, but I still just got bored

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Moana is also really good

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

anitnal

What was this supposed to say? I canā€™t figure it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And it all maybe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I donā€™t know but it looks weird and I know vaguely what they meant so Iā€™m okay using this as shorthand from now on, and we really need new words.

In favor/opposed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesnā€™t help that you know all the characters die in the end

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oddly? I gave more of a shit about most of the characters in rogue one than all the characters in the sequels combined.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I wasnā€™t a huge fan of the sequels either lol the first one was ok but after that they were pretty awful. I at least felt like I kind of knew the characters by the end though

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I felt like the first one wasnā€™t impressive, but suggested at least some sort of plan. I felt like there were characters to get to know?

And then there werenā€™t.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If youā€™re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 912

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments