1 point

This whole night was so many layers of exhausting, but probably not for the reasons you think… No rational, serious person was expecting Biden to Willy Wonka front somersault into this debate? it was going to be what this was, the only true surprise was probably the volume of his voice (which they chalk up to a cold, okay fine, I guess) and actually how well he did quickly processing and responding to trump’s gish gallop and unchecked stream of consciousness mistruth firehose with little help from the impotent moderators for the majority of the night.

The people in this country, in their immediate reaction to this debate, demonstrate that they just fundamentally lack the focus, empathv and frankly basic intelligence to process the substance of this or any debate. On average, we respond solely to voice pitch, tonality, body language and facial expressions, like a still developing toddler… Or a dog.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

How often do you spam this exact comment? This is now the third time I’ve seen your comment. First, Second.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I mean, this same topic is in like 10 different threads right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Damn, I guess I’m going to ignore years of evidence that Biden’s admin can function just fine and go with my feelings on this one. I mean would you vote constructively if it meant getting over yourself? Of course not. We’re Americans. We want a leader with a good jaw, not with good character or good ideas.

Nah but seriously though. Biden and Trump make me feel bad so I’m going to vote in a way that harms the country. That’ll show us.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

I mean, you’d think the total inability to hide Biden and Trumps’ cognitive dysfunction, caught on camera many, many times over the last few years, and now live and in color, would be enough to get people to stop pretending that there’s a good option here. Hell, Biden’s handlers have been caught on camera making sure he doesn’t wander off, like they had for Feinstein before she died.

But then again, Americans have watched the gradual, but now inevitable, slide into fascism over the last 40 years and managed to convince themselves that all is well, provided the guy enabling it is wearing their preferred jersey, so I guess we’ll just chill and let Biden and Trumps’ unelected handlers rule the country.

It’s too bad you all didn’t vote for Williamson in the primary. It’s been clear neither of these two assholes are fit for a long time, just like it was clear Feinstein wasn’t fit when she was falling asleep in hearings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The people guiding Biden at least have an interest in keeping the united states functional. The people guiding Trump want to watch it burn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No they don’t.

They have an interest in keeping themselves rich, consequences be damned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Biden’s people have an interest in keeping their jobs for the next 4 years, let’s be real here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The people guiding Biden at least have an interest in keeping the united states functional

… for their corporate sponsors, who’s interests slightly align with yours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And this is the best point to make right here. Well said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What I don’t understand about the handlers thing is that when I watch other famous people walking and talking: I see their handlers steer them, give them signals, whisper names in their ear. And you know what? Celebrities in their prime look awkward all the time. People who have nothing to worry about but their craft and being famous screw up all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, but those people don’t have the power to destroy the entire world when their brain short-circuits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

ignore years of evidence that Biden’s admin can function

They’re doing a real bang-up job, both at home and abroad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wish we went further left, but the reality is that Biden has been a steady hand at the wheel where we’ve come out of economic unknown of the covid shut downs pretty well. We still have a ways to go, but we’re heading in the right direction, and the most glaring problem (namely inflation) was something baked in before he even came into office.

Abroad we actually have the respect of much of the world, and it feels like to our allies that we are actually a partner that can be trusted on. Keep in mind that if you told a republican of the 80s that a US president rally the west against an imperialistic russia invading Europe, without committing a single US or NATO troop, and exposed them for how weak they are, then they would have said he was the second coming of Reagan.

Do I disagree with a lot of what he has done? Yes. But it’s been a steady ride. Compared to Trump’s presidency, which was a bumpy ride throughout, handing off an economy that looked like it could just go completely into the shitter, and threatening our alliances across the world, he looks like straight up looks like one of the best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yeah, I mean, nevermind all the pending criminal charges and evidence of incompetence from Trump’s 4 years in office where we had weekly “infrastructure week” failures, a constant stream of garbage tweets parading as “official Presidential communications”, and egregious power grabs by the Executive branch. Trump said all his same BS in a more convincing-sounding voice during last night’s debate and the guy with a known stuttering issue just didn’t have a strong-sounding voice, that’s all the convincing I needed. Biden is just so old, I literally can’t tell them apart <teeheehee>!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
3 points
*

Don’t forget how:

"I’m NOT voting for an entire apparatus of executive government with thousands of employees, I’m ONLY voting for a charismatic messiah godking, because I’m still little more than a medieval peasant looking to be mesmerized.

Then if fascists take over the nation (again) and the most vulnerable among me suffer from it (again and again and again), that’s not MY problem. While (somehow) fancying myself as enlightened and special and pure. I’m at the center of my goddamned Universe!"

The Supreme Court, and how republicans effectively staged a coup of it in 2016 by turning their back on Merrick Garland, then packed it with corrupt right-wing zealots? “Not MY problem!”… until it is, but by then it’s way too late.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

First of all- I agree concerns about both their ages are very much valid here but hasn’t Biden had a stutter from a very young age and struggled with it most of his life? Surely we should cut the guy some slack here?

That said, of course there won’t be slack. Political debates (especially one of high stakes as this one) are cut throat and no one has room for error.

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

hasn’t Biden had a stutter from a very young age and struggled with it most of his life?

It hasn’t apparently impacted his public speaking for most of his political career up until recently:

https://youtu.be/86Nrv5izaTs?si=bZ9WNXIEZNOaBV3T

And even when not speaking during tonight’s debate, he often looked totally bewildered.

People have been saying this for quite a while now despite the excuses from the Democrat establishment, but tonight there was no hiding the fact that the dude just looks unable to last another four years as president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

And even when not speaking during tonight’s debate, he often looked totally bewildered.

To be fair, my partner and I also looked totally bewildered by the things falling out of Trump’s face. I don’t know that he actually answered a single question, but rather spouted the same racist nonsense over and over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

That’s a silver lining.

Biden looks like he’s on the verge of croaking, so maybe, just maybe, we’ll get a black, female fascist enabler instead of an old white male fascist enabler for once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Being a narcissistic, bloviating despot is exactly what everyone expected of Trump. In fact, he came off rather well from the time constraints, muted mics, and the total lack of fact-checking because the format of the debate didn’t expose his weaknesses like it did for Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In his first presidential primary in 1988, Biden was the front runner despite his youth because he was wildly regarded as one of the best public speakers in the country and he was (at the time) charismatic.

Then he started yelling at reporters about how high his IQ was after they found out he plagiarized speeches plagiarized work in law school, and lied about his grades and class standing.

Because he got over his childhood stutter. In childhood.

What’s happening now isn’t a stutter. It’s 100% normal for an 82 year old.

That doesn’t mean an 82 year old is fit to be president, just that Biden acts how an 82 year old is expected to act. Because he’s 82 years old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Brother don’t lie to yourself, that was way more than a just a stutter. Nobody who watched that debate is under the impression that the problem was Joe Biden stuttered sometimes. I understand you’re disappointed and trying to cope somehow but it’s not healthy to just create a fantasy. It was a train wreck. It was real real bad. Just accept it and move on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

@njm1314@lemmy.world My dude, go easy. I’m from the UK, I have no reason to create a fantasy, just making an observation. Please don’t make these kinda discussions a “shut up and listen here” kind of thing.

Edit: tagged user

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I honestly didn’t think he went that hard on you… It definitely didn’t come across as a “shut up and listen here” comment.

That said, if you saw any of the clips, I think it was clear and obvious that his stutter was not the issue.

In 2020, there was a lot of talk about his stutter, and that made seemed right. Here lately Biden is giving me “Weekend at Bernie” vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

It was a disaster. Trump lied for 90 minutes straight, but he did it confidently, with a straight face, and without rambling. It was a vast improvement over his stump speeches. Biden mostly told the truth, but he meandered, stammered, got mixed up, and was obviously ill. That’s just what happened.

I’m going to vote for Biden anyway, because the old man stands for policies that actually benefit me personally (and a second Trump term is a threat to the existence of the Republic). But the debate was bad for him, possibly catastrophic. His campaign desperately needs an October surprise, and at this point it’s hard to guess what it might be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think “without rambling” is more than just a stretch. Dude was all over place, but he was able to ramble clearly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

One thing to remember is they didn’t have notes, earpieces or teleprompters.

Trump just straight up rambled out a stream of bullshit, lies, and projection every time he had the mic. Biden was not only answering factually, but also had to counter bullshit. They were on the same stage but playing two completely different games.

And when the debate is analyzed down to “who was more truthful?”, Biden slightly flubbing a fact/figure will be treated near equally to Trump straight up spewing out bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The problem is that most Americans don’t care about the truth

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Well, this American sure does and will be voting in November. Suggest everyone does the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Go back and watch his 2020 debate footage or his VP debates. This was not his stutter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Shit just go back and watch the fuckin STATE OF THE UNION. Where was THAT Biden???

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

That was a teleprompter.

He just did a speech today on a teleprompter and was supposedly fine as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points
*

“It votes for the geezer or it gets the fascist again.”

Edit: Iam eh gud spellor

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Feeling free yet?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I had to do this … it was just too good. My wife chuckled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think it’s important to note that the fascist is also a geezer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

True dat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

*or it gets the geezer fascist again

But unironically yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
129 points

Why the fuck are these two the choices?!

permalink
report
reply
123 points

Because the system is set up to prevent any real change for the benefit of the common people. So your choice is between the friendly, somewhat reasonable oligarchy stooge and the utterly deranged oligarchy stooge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

A somewhat less pessimistic take: the system is set up to be self-stable.

And it was also designed so that States would have most of the power, not the Federal government.

At various points in history the common people did get benefits. New Deal. Universal suffrage. Civil rights. Abolition.

But it always requires a critical mass of the population to support change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Like in the 2016 election? Or in 2000? The system is set up to prevent the will of the people from being enacted and it takes a massive crisis for everyone to be pissed off enough to do something. Add to that the control of nearly all media by the oligarchy and you get to where we are today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And it was also designed so that States would have most of the power, not the Federal government.

Yeah, but then we changed it because of the civil war…

The system was designed for the president to be a mostly performative figurehead. Then we gave the president real power, but left determination like the president didn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because that’s all our owners will let us have. Thanks citizen United for hammering in that final nail in our collective coffin

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Do you think it’s just that, or that maybe the fact that too many people don’t give a shit in-between election years might play a role as well? Because from what I’ve seen over the decades- is that a lot of SJWs enjoy rising up every four years to complain about shit- then disappear until the next election.

Without fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because we’re ruled by the billionaire class, and they like giving us two useful idiots to choose from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Same reason every independent store and restaurant gets replaced by a chain.

People want what’s familiar. Both these men won their primaries and have the most support out of anyone in their parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your example works but it’s more like because capitalism concentrates wealth and power and little guys have no chance

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Look at the last handful of democratic presidential losses to see this in action:

Gore gets nominated due to familiarity. He has the charisma of a warm sponge. He loses (barely, and not the popular vote; by the way, FUCK the electoral college) to George W. “I’d have a beer with him and hey wasn’t his dad president?” Bush.

Kerry somehow rises to the top of the next democratic primary, a fact that I will never understand, because he also has the charisma of a warm sponge. Bush is familiar and a wartime president. He is re-elected in defiance of God and nature.

Obama comes along and is a once in a generation political talent. Things are pretty good for a while.

Hillary enters the primary and wins mainly based on name recognition. She presents herself as having the charisma of a warm sponge, when we all know full well that she has the charisma of a wood chipper, and since we’re pretty good at detecting artifice she loses.

In 2019 we’ve got a pretty good set of primary choices, but Biden gets into the ring and that’s pretty much fucking it, because, again, he has name recognition, so he blows past some better, younger choices and manages to leverage his name and Trump’s fuck-ups enough to win.

The pattern is that name recognition will get you a real long way, especially with low information voters, and that is a real goddamn problem when there are objectively better options who aren’t as famous.

So anyway, I think we need a constitutional amendment forbidding members of one’s immediate family from running for president after one has been president. No sons, daughters, husbands, wives, etc. Fuck dynasties. Fucking fundamentally un-American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

Why does the Superbowl only have two teams? It seems unfair since I don’t know how the two teams were selected and I don’t really care enough to pay attention / find out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because not enough people give a shit in-between election years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

NO. The question is, if we had a viable (sane and cognizant) third choice fit for the job, why would it STILL be one of these two BOZOS getting elected in November?

What a tragedy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Enshittification is not only in corporations

permalink
report
parent
reply

Videos

!videos@lemmy.world

Create post

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only

  2. Follow the global rules as laid out here while posting and commenting.

  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments