106 points

Wouldn’t it be incredible if this is what finally took him down? You just know he’s going to make some false statements to law enforcement.

permalink
report
reply
171 points

Why would this be any different than the time he colluded with Russia on live TV, had a phone call recorded asking to change election results, intentionally retained national security documents after leaving office, rallying the mob that tried to stop the election results, or any of the other things we already have on record?

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points
*

Fun tangential fact: Trump’s collusion was found to be legally okay per the Mueller report because they had no evidence they directly coordinated with each other. This is very similar to how SuperPACS cannot directly coordinate with election campaigns but simply engage in obvious call-and-response as Trump did with Russia. Corrupt as fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

That is about as unfun a fact as I can think of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I thought there was lots of evidence but mueller basically said it wasn’t his place to prosecute and I’m going to leave it up to congress to do their job and prosecute.

They did not do their job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Muller didn’t even pretend to follow the money, I don’t buy this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Different collusion. And they didn’t say it was okay - just that they didn’t have any evidence that Trump himself had been involved.

Then the report went on to say as clearly as the justice department is allowed to say that Trump absolutely engaged in obstruction of justice. They couldn’t indict a sitting President, and you can’t make a public accusation against someone you aren’t going to indict.

Mueller said that if Trump were innocent of obstruction, he’d say he was, but that he would not say that. He laid out specific criteria for what constitutes obstruction, cited many specific occasions in which he met all those criteria, testified before Congress that if he weren’t the sitting President he would have brought charges against him, and said directly that it was Congress’s duty to impeach him.

But somehow the GOP convinced everyone that the Mueller report was an exonneration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Also, the blowjob he gave Putin live in Helsinki.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s hard to give a blowjob if you’re dead, or not in the same location as the receiver.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

True, but considering the numerous other crimes he’s committed haven’t taken him down yet, I’m not so hopeful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Plus, it would have to go through the courts. And if he gets elected, good luck with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Uff yes, imagine people find out that he lies. That would be epic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You may not be aware of our two tiered justice system in the United States

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How would that happen? It’s obvious he was shot at. Others in the crowd got killed/injured as a result of the gunfire. This just seems like standard procedure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Pray for the agent that has to parse his statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How would that [Trump going down for making some false statements to law enforcement] happen?

What follows is wild unfounded speculation that 99.9% didn't happen, but is technically a barely plausible hypothetical answer to your question.

If the ear injury wasn’t caused by a bullet, then the miss wasn’t as near as we thought it was.

If it missed by a lot despite being at [relatively] short range [for the type of gun used], then maybe it was on purpose.

If the shooter missed on purpose, maybe it was because he was hired by Trump for a false-flag operation in order to allow Trump to claim martyrdom, or even a casus belli to purge his enemies.

If this sort of absurd conspiracy were what actually happened, maybe Trump would lie to the FBI to try to cover it up, get caught, and get charged with more crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

The FBI agent tasked to transcribe the interview

permalink
report
reply
62 points

Is this even news? Seems like a pretty standard thing in an investigation. Of course you interview the victim.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

With the difference that the victim is apparently very enraged that they want to talk to him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If the victim lies to the FBI said victim may be criminally charged again. If it wasn’t a bullet that would be an embarrassment for victim’s campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Donald cannot open his mouth without lying so he probably shouldn’t do it towards a federal agent when it would be a crime. Not that he would ever be prosecuted since we have a multi-tiered “justice” system.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’m guessing no one read the article that says this is completely normal.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It sure is. Sometimes they find something they weren’t expecting though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And is nothing more than a lame attempt at keeping trump in the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 483K

    Comments