235 points

Agreed. The Green Party sits on their ass until presidential election. They haven’t moved the needle. Best case scenario, they’ve convinced a few non-voters to participate. Worst case, they’re dishonest opportunists.

permalink
report
reply
111 points

This angle also needs to be considered). She’s not running in good faith. She’s essentially functioning as a 5th column to pull away voters who would otherwise vote for Harris.

I’m not saying Harris shouldn’t be pushed on environmental issues. I am saying that trying to do that by voting for Stein is actively harmful to the goal of not letting the fascists win this election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

More importantly, if you are voting for her because of the environment, voting for stein is actually harmful to that goal because it helps trump win, which means instead of making baby steps in the right direction, we’ll run full steam in the wrong direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

The Dems aren’t making baby steps in the right direction, though, look up the progression of natural gas exports under Joe Biden. They’re actively making big steps in the wrong direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Fascists and Putin are sure to support her however they can. Cue the trolls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Most of the greens here on Lemmy convinced me to never consider a green canidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I would absolutely vote Green but to do so would be unthinkable until we have ranked choice voting. We should band all the leftists together for one big push to get that enacted everywhere. Once we do that we can go back to our divisive bickering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

The trouble with supporting a third party – and I say this as someone inclined to support a third party – is that anybody who actually does it is either (a) an idiot who doesn’t understand the game theory of first-past-the-post voting, or (b) an incredibly fringe nutjob. The result is that all third parties absolutely destroy all their credibility and ruin any chance of getting more mainstream.

If you’re a third-party-inclined person who isn’t an idiot or a nutjob, your only real option is to vote for Democrats in general, and ones who support ranked choice voting in particular (because you sure as Hell aren’t gonna get it from the Republicans), and then switch to your third party of choice only after ranked-choice voting is passed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

My state is nowhere near anywhere close to being a swing-state. My vote for president carries very little weight. For this reason, I vote for whichever party actually aligns with my ideology.

An acquaintance once tried to scapegoat me and my vote for Jill Stein as the reason that Donald Trump won in 2016.

That’s not how the electoral college works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

If you’re a third-party-inclined person who isn’t an idiot or a nutjob, your only real option is to vote for Democrats in general, and ones who support ranked choice voting in particular (because you sure as Hell aren’t gonna get it from the Republicans), and then switch to your third party of choice only after ranked-choice voting is passed.

The Democrats are going to give you ranked-choice voting so they can potentially lose your vote… Thank god you are not an idiot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Libertarians == conservatives who smoke weed

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Wrong. http://gpus.nationbuilder.com/officeholders

You’re the one sitting on your ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
-1 points

managed to do it without spoiling presidential elections with the support of Democrats and their donors. AOC backs them, they are a complete fake left organization to draw you in and accomplish nothing.

Democrats have you fooled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

The Green Party sits on their ass until presidential election.

They hold over 140 offices across 20 states. Seems a little disingenuous to claim that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Across an entire nation, they have 140 whole offices. They have more people on their party organizing committee than people in office. None of those 140 are even at the level of state legislature, despite there being many races with unopposed Democrats that only have a few thousand total votes cast in them.

The last election for my state rep had 4,000 votes cast. He had a single opponent from a party I’ve never heard of who got 1,000 of them. There were more candidates running under that low name ID and sparesly funded local party than there were Green candidates. If they were a real party trying to advance progressive causes, this would be an ideal place to build local representation. Single-party state, tons of DINOs to challenge from the left, and low turnout that could make successful challenges possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s uhhh. A very interesting data point. Really kind of hangs the light on the problem…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Wow, 143 elected offices is massive. Such prestigious positions as “Neighborhood Council”, “Conservation District”, “Town Commission”, “Planning Group”, “Park Commission” (Pawnee reference??), “Select Board”, “Zoning Board of Appeals Alternate”, “Water District Board of Commissioners”, “School Committee”, “Advisory Neighborhood Commission”, and gasp what’s this? The mayor of a California town of 22,000 people? Why if all of them banded together and moved to Connecticut (and somehow became popular with the residents there), they could collectively make almost 77% of an entire Connecticut General Assembly and literally no other offices including mayorships, governorships, all of the other state legislatures and the federal legislature, and all the god-knows-how-many positions in local governments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

So now the goalposts are moved from they don’t do anything but presidential candidates to they don’t do enough? Maybe if they had better funding they could run more candidates. Saying they do nothing but presidential candidates is still disingenuous no matter how much you want to belittle their othet work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s a drop of LSD in a lake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
152 points

I don’t think it bodes well she sat with Putin at a conference, whether there was “language barriers” or not.

permalink
report
reply
102 points

Oh come on, she had another American there to make sure nothing fishy was going on. The always beyond reproach Michael Flynn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Putin obviously could give two shits about the planet. He just knew that she’d pull more votes from Clinton than Trump.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/russians-launched-pro-jill-stein-social-media-blitz-help-trump-n951166

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I honestly can’t recall if it was some sort of geopolitical analysis in the comments or actual news anymore, but years ago I read that climate change and the collapse of the North Atlantic Current would eventually open up vast areas of Siberia to mining/drilling, improve farming conditions in Russia, harm farming, solar, and wind in Western Europe, while dropping the temps in Western Europe. It would also raise temps in the eastern/southern U.S. and make hurricanes more dangerous and economically damaging along the entire Atlantic and Gulf coasts.
What I read concluded that climate change would be a major boon to Russia and any sensible leader there would want to facilitate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True. Unfortunately, there will be no way to hit the brakes on climate change once it has progressed to the point of a green Siberia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Flynn pisses me off so much, it amazes me you can spend your entire career serving your country in mostly a leadership role and still end up a traitor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Wasn’t there a cushy job at a military contractor he could have filled? Or was he so bad that nobody would offer him one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The fact that the only responses to this picture have always been whataboutisms is very telling. When ranked-choice voting comes, and I think it will, my first choice vote is gonna go to a leftist party with real principles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

So what if they we were at the same dinner? I’ve had dinner with my enemies too. It seems like a lot of you are imagining much greater nefarious activity than you have any real evidence for, or I am missing something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-96 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

>Third-party fringe candidate who gets less than 1% of the vote having dinner with Putin, Trump’s national security advisor who was later arrested for lying to the FBI about his ties to Russia, and several major Russian political figures before an election in which Russian interference provably helped Trump win.

>The US president acting in an official capacity and meeting with the leader of a major world power.

“They’re the same picture.”

Boy, Russian bots Jill Stein stans are really tripping over each other to see who’s the biggest, dumbest idiot, aren’t they?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Willie Wimmer is spouting some pro invasionist nationalistic bs on all the fringe media since he left Bundestag.

So we have a fine assortment of people here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-97 points
  • Third-party fringe candidate who gets less than 1% of the vote

  • President of the United States, who got over 51% of the vote

God damn, who is going to have more influence over national policy I wonder?

Jill Stein stans are really tripping over each other

The SCOTUS recently decided a president can’t be held liable for acts committed in official capacity as a means of shielding the Cheeto-in-Chief from any and all criminal liabilities. It appears some folks on Lemmy are piling on board with this reasoning, so long as they can use it to shield Genocide Joe. A democrat could shoot a man on fifth avenue in broad daylight, and you’d see people on here defend it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
121 points

It is admittedly a little ironic that the Greens’ existence has likely resulted in the rollback of environmental regulations. It’s almost like their top leadership post-Nader is just accelerationist in philosophy.

permalink
report
reply
-103 points

I trust Greens to protect environmental policies much more than the DNC, they would follow through with their promises and not just spout populous bullshit while doing nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
120 points

It’s great that they can pretend that’d be the case while standing literally no possible risk of being elected. It’s easy to stand by your morals when there is no risk at all of having to defend or enact them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

And that sweet sweet Putin money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-54 points

I would rather vote for what I want in government and not get it than to vote against something and get it anyway. Democrats voted against Trump and his policies in 2020 and got someone keeping his worst policies, and now want someone even further to the right than Biden was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Then they should join the DNC and reform it from the inside. Join the progressive movement. Shift the Dems back to the center-left. All they’re doing as a separate party is siphon votes away from DNC, which gives an advantage to the RNC, which erodes their own efforts to push green policies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

Reforming from the inside is liberal fantasy. The party is operating as designed and they will not allow anyone to vote away their power.

The solution is to abandon the DNC and support an actual party representing the working class. 3rd party’s do not siphon away votes because we wouldn’t vote for your party if there were no 3rd option on the ballot. We are not democrats so we would not vote for a democrat

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

What actions have the Greens taken to inspire your confidence?

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

With what power? If the Green party continues doing nothing, gaining no local seats, no congressional seats, then how are they protecting environmental policy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

They’re helping Trump win like they helped him win in 2016 by acting as a spoiler party, and everyone knows that Trump is a champion of the environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I don’t. They’re not a serious party, and due to how shitty our electoral process is, all they do at the end of the day is strip votes from the Democratic candidates.

I wish that wasn’t how our elections worked, but it is. Pretending that’s not the case is a self-defeating strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

They’re not stripping away votes that they are not entitled to, that’s not how things work. We wouldn’t vote for your shitty candidates if they were the only one on the ballot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
  • Populist.
permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

I trust Greens to protect environmental policies much more than the DNC

Idk if I “trust” them to do anything, per say. I’ve never seen a Green candidate assume office.

But the argument I see from Democrats is that you have to vote for the liberal guy accepting kickbacks and sinecures from the O&G industry or you’ll get the conservative guy accepting kickbacks and sinecures from the O&G industry, instead. My current crop of Dem-aligned city and state officials are hugely in the tank for the petroleum industry, they’ve done little more than greenwashing when it comes to waste management and sustainable development in their districts, and they are openly hostile to environmental groups in town.

If the Green Party becomes the refuge for people disillusioned with the O&G aligned local democrats, who is to blame for that? Insidious Machiavellian Jill Stein? Nefarious GOP ratfvckers? The shadowy hand of Vladimir Putin? Or the Democrats who consistently fail to deliver mass transit, waste recycling, and environmental regulation, even within their base strongholds?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

The greens hold over 140 offices across 20 states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Putin owns this lady. You’re a dumb, bad, selfish person, Jill.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Jill seems to think the Dems are running Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

Care to drop some key policy differences between Harris and Biden?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The epitome of useful idiot on the left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Ah yes the tried and true Democrat response to any criticism from the folks on the left

Step 1. Blame Russia Step 2. ??? Step 3. Profit

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Wonder where Stein’s money comes from right before elections.

Some people are asking.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 412K

    Comments