cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/41400661

228 points
*

The system can listen to conversations and play ads when there’s a moment of silence. Or play a video when you’re close to the shops.

Oh good, I was worried the slide into dystopia might be slowing down for a second there.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Imagine driving to the doctors, you have a killer headache so the radio is muted, you drive past a set of shops near a red light.

“COME OVER TOCRAZY MIKES INSANE CRAPAGANZAAAAAAAA” *obnoxiously loud music plays behind the screaming mans words*

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

Ah i see, time for ford to go down in the history books.

Not like that will happen, but i truly think they deserve that as a result for even considering this.

I’m already sick of the amount of ads that find a way into my private living space, but i’ve managed to negate 90% of them.

“We need to make money” yeah sure, but not at the cost of me. If you want to make money off of me i need you to sell me stuff i get to keep and are actually worth the cost.

I work too much and make too little to allow them to invade my private space.

permalink
report
reply
73 points
*

Time for a law to be passed that kills off this bad idea permanently.

The main cause of fatal accidents is driver distraction. Anything that adds to it is moving in the wrong direction.

They should also ban the use of tablet computers in place of proper displays and controls in vehicles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Time for a law to be passed that kills off this bad idea permanently.

With governments (of all alignments) in the pockets of, or otherwise under the influence of, the very large corporations whose advertising would stand to benefit from this, I have only the following to say: Good luck with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not enough. Amazon tablets started with ads only on Lock Screen and startup. Those are also not ok

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

For those who don’t understand Ford’s strategy here: Ford has tons of goofy patents like this, and they’re just waiting for someone else to do this so they can get royalties.

They’re patent trolling bad ideas…

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Maybe so at this point in history. Don’t be surprised when Ford implements it or something similar at a later date. Ads are in most everything now and they have already sold your data to insurance companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

“it’s just in the corner, when you drive near one of our Partner companies”

“it’s just a square on the main menu”

“it’s just a brief full-screen suggestion”

“it’s just whispering sweet nothings at a forced-volume into your Harman Kardon premium audio system (we have always done this for plebs who opted for our standard audio system)”

“it just adds an additional waypoint to your route, like our new Signature Partner, Dunkin’ Doughnuts. Get a free small coffee when you spend $15 and say the keywords ‘ADS4LIFE’ into the drive-thru robot”

“it’s only taking control and driving you in comfort to your nearest Ford dealership to trade-in your vehicle at 100,000 miles”

“it’s only siphoning your blood plasma to keep the FordOS AI financially afloat”

“it’s only recording your banking details at the ATM and charging you a monthly weekly fee to support and assist you with our cutting-edge technology”

“GIVE US ALL YOUR MONEY NOW OR WE ARE DRIVING YOU OFF THE GRAND CANYON”

permalink
report
parent
reply

“GIVE US ALL YOUR MONEY NOW OR WE ARE DRIVING YOU OFF THE GRAND CANYON"

Can I just skip straight to this part?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s a lot more clever than actually building this grotesque idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Thanks for calling attention to this. Oftentimes when a patent is applied for there is no intent to implement it. This is actually a clever way to get ahead of the direction of the market and license to other manufacturers.

Having said that, it’s still Ford, and once it’s generally accepted for this type of ad to be displayed they’ll jump on it real quick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is a patent troll, stiffling innovation gaming the patent system for something [we hope] they never intend to produce. Even if it’s a horrible idea we want stifled, that’s still a patent troll

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

once it’s generally accepted for this type of ad to be displayed they’ll jump on it real quick.

That’s inevitable, but in this scenario they own the patent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points
*

I’ve been saying it for years - business people are the scum of the earth. The whole situation is so stupid. Why do we train people how to make take as much money as they can… why not teach them to not be assholes instead?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I knew someone who taught Marketing at a business school and we had some really weird discussions. They do teach students not to be assholes. They do teach ethics. They do teach respect for the viewer. But what they teach for Marketing is very different from what we experience from Marketing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

From my experiences it goes more like this “In an ideal world, we’d behave this way. We’re not in an ideal world though and your competitors have no problem doing this so you should know what to do, in case the market determines it’s the best course.” with a knowing wink thrown in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No plan or ethical framework survives contact with the shareholders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I want to blame shareholders. The constant drive to fuck the people working for you to make an extra 10 cents is disgusting. Record profits though! Here have a pizza party, only 1 slice per person though, more isn’t in the budget.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Good Guy Ford patents the worst possible technology so no other automaker can use it, and then never implements it themselves.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

That’s what I was going to ask, should people start patenting things in order to prevent companies from using them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Getting patent is fucking expensive, also it is afaik region-limited. You can get your patent for say EU, you need lawyers and lot of money for that, and if you would like to extend that to US, you need new lawyers and more money.

So it is out of realm of what’s possible for normal person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not that expensive in the US. A few hundred is typical, and you don’t need a lawyer (though spending the money on one up front will save you from spending more when you screw it up the first few times).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think you can sue to invalidate a patent in that situation

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 517K

    Comments