594 points

Fuck Spez

permalink
report
reply
221 points

He’s such a disgusting greedy little pig boy who frankly belongs in a deep hole where nobody will find him πŸ™

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Saddam meme with Sadam crossed out and replaced with Spez.jpg

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Interesting given that he is actually preparing for an apocalypse scenario where he hides out in a bunker only to emerge a leader of men.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/doomsday-prep-for-the-super-rich

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I agree, but what the Irish are doing is dumb. If reddit it hit with that, then so should Google and the whole of the internet, since everything can get you videos. No one should be in charge of sensoring the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

If you want to operate in a country, you have to abide by their laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If you want to restrict your people more than the rest of the world, cut yourself off from the world wide web.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve read your sentence multiple times and I’ve no idea what it means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I mean, there’s one typo where it says β€œit” instead of β€œis”, but other than that it all looks to make sense enough. By all the votes it looks like most people understand it just fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Absolutely fuck spez.

But he’s right here. Just because he’s a fuckstick doesn’t mean he’s always wrong on every issue 100% of the time.

Various forms of censorship under the flag of β€˜online safety’ have been pushed by governments since the internet began to exist. And before that with print media and television. Censorship is not the answer. Never was. First it was for porn, then it was for video games, then it was for hate speech, it’s always something.

But in the words of Captain Jean-Luc Picard,

β€œWith the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.”

Censorship must be opposed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I disagree since I think censorship can be desired when combatting hate speech. Maybe we just disagree how exactly we use the word β€˜censorship’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, the community needs to cyber bully them off the platform. They need to feel rejection for their words, not censorship. Censorship lets them frame themselves as the victim as they seek out a smaller echo chamber on the fringes. They need to learn their words will turn the community against them

We still have to live with them. We can’t ignore them or silence them - we have to correct them

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You are addressing the wrong problem. You’re focusing on the symptom rather than the disease.

Fighting hate speech rather than hatred itself only strengthens the hatred. As soon as you say β€œyou mustn’t say that” you validate the hatred and give it power. Look at any counterculture, positive or negative. Trying to suppress it only validates it, gives it legitimacy as being important enough for the establishment to want to suppress, and if the people who might support the hatred already don’t like the people who would suppress the hate speech, you’ve just poured fuel on the fire.

The problem to be fixed isn’t hate speech, it’s hatred. It’s a tougher problem to solve, but a much more important one that you will actually get a productive effect by solving it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Who would you have define hate speech in the US? SCOTUS?

Many citizens may agree on the definition, but I wouldn’t trust our government to draw those lines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It requires them to restrict certain categories of video, so that users cannot share content on cyberbullying, promoting eating disorders, promotion of self harm or incitement to hatred on a number of grounds.

Yeh, fuck censorship. Let’s all be shitbags and do that stuff instead!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair, censorship on Reddit is already very very aggressive. I was banned for saying β€œyay” on a news thread about the death of the queen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You don’t have to be a porn star or even a porn consumer to oppose laws banning porn.

And you don’t have to be a shitbag to recognize that, while well-intentioned, censorship is still censorship.

I have absolutely no love whatsoever for the people who would spread such crap. I would love to get rid of it. But banning the speech doesn’t do that. It’s like smashing the altimeter in the airplane and then declaring that you’re not crashing anymore. But the reality is, smashing instruments in the airplane is never a great idea whether you are crashing or not. It just prevents you from seeing things you don’t want to. And you get hurt in the process.

Censorship, historically, has never ended up anywhere good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I think reducing the visibility of some kinds of content can be good, especially for those under 18. E.g. when it comes to content around suicide, I think it is better if children/teenagers see β€œthere is support for you, please speak to a charity for free on this phone number” instead of pro-suicide content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That I would actually very much agree with. As Elon himself said in the early days of the Twitter takeover, β€œfree speech does not mean free reach”.

This is also why I think engagement algorithms are a cancer on our civilization. If it is in a platforms monetary interest to amplify the most vile anger inducing stuff, be that stuff that is actively bad like hate speech or simply divisive like a lot of political crap, that is bad for our society. It pushes us farther apart when we should be coming together to fix the problems that we can agree on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
247 points
*

It requires them to restrict certain categories of video, so that users cannot share content on cyberbullying, promoting eating disorders, promotion of self harm or incitement to hatred on a number of grounds.

Wow, what a horrible, restraining overreach.

I am shedding tears for the 1.2% engagement loss this would cost Reddit next quarter. Imagine what they have to pay devs for filtering abusive videos!

(I hate to sound so salty, but its mind boggling that they would fight this so vehemently, instead of just… filtering abusive content? Which they already do for anything that actually costs them any profit).

permalink
report
reply
85 points

Well…the problem is reddit’s size.

I’m not part of reddit anymore because they filtered me out for abusive content.

The content that was so abusive? I told a story on /r/Cleveland about the time 35 years ago I got my bike stolen.

I wasn’t accusing any current reddit user of being the theif. But reddit bots flagged me of being abusive to other users.

We don’t even know if that guy who stole my bike 35 years ago is even still alive, much less an active redditor on /r/Cleveland. So who am I being abusive to, when I say it’s a bad idea to let strangers ride your bike without some kind of assurance you’ll get it back?

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

I got banned when I told a literal Nazi, that said that literal Jews should die, should drink bleach to purify their genes before they contaminated the genepool.

I still stand by it. my grandfather fucked up Nazis, and I’ll fuck up Nazis too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

based

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is a common tactic. I’ve seen people describe the same process many times before.

  1. Nazi says literal Nazi shit.
  2. Person gets baited into responding.
  3. Person gets ban hammer. Nazi does not.
  4. Nazi moves on to next target. Repeat from step 1.

They usually trot this out when they see a comment or account they want to silence. That’s how the fascists do censorship on reddit.

It’s happened to me too. Since then I’ve seen people saying the same general thing has happened to them. They must know that reddits content moderators, the β€œAnti-evil Operations” or whatever bullshit, is on their side. It’s the only explanation. Probably the nazis went and got jobs there. Or maybe it’s just that spez is a nazi himself. Reddit beneath the thin veneer of default subreddits has always been a very right leaning platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Anarchy in the US baby!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I got banned from r/politics for saying fighting Nazis is an old American tradition. Every grandparent from mine and my wives trees, spaning 4 different countries of Commonwealth, all fought against fascism.

When banned from pol I commented on a half dozen news articles on the top of all telling my story, then dropping the axiom, β€œif you want to know who’s in charge, find out who you can’t insult”.

IP banned. Fuck reddit. They’ve destroyed everything Aaron tried to build in that site, and we are all the lessor for it.

If someone’s already on their way out, could you take that trash Spez out with you? Youd be doing everyone a solid. There’s lots of garbage around tho, it’s understandable if you decide some other trash. But we should all prob considering taking some trash out with us as we go, leave the world a better place and all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Fair. +1

But also, that just sounds like they’re cheaping out on content filtering. And, you know, kinda broke the enthusiastic community moderation that made it great in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yes, that’s true. This all happened like 3 weeks after they went public IPO. I didn’t buy it, because I thought reddit had a decent chance of falling on it’s ass on the free market. It’s a 10+ year old company that’s never made a profit. It’s reasonable to assume it might fail.

3 weeks after I declined, and they went public, I suddenly get 3 temporary bans in a week, and the 3rd one was a permanent ban. All by autobots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Well…the problem is reddit’s size.

They’ve never been shy about targeting certain subs and communities for shutdown when it suits their commercial interests. This has nothing to do with size and everything to do with the nature of the content itself.

These videos are pure clickbait. They feed engagement. They build up lots of enthusiasm both among content providers and active users. And, as a consequence, they make the company money.

But reddit bots flagged me of being abusive to other users.

Bots will flag any post purely based on keyword searches and AI parsing of sentiment. Its got nothing to do with your actual statement. But it also depends heavily on who you are, where you post, and how often other users flag you. Very possibly you simply got β€œReport” flagged a bunch of times by other users for some reason and that - plus a naive parsing - was all the AI bot needed to know.

But I’ll also bet the post wasn’t getting thousands of unique interactions and external visits. If you’d been a power-poster who was posting a face-cam rant rather than a text blob, I suspect you’d have been fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

same with me and /r/Toronto got banned for stating a long dead prime minister was horrible to indigenous people. they used the excuse that I was submitting too many articles about crimes in the city as that subreddit’s mods automatically remove any content about crime or pro Palestinian content.

Post god knows how many photos of the CN tower, the fucking sun setting or snow…hey that’s great! anything that’s news worthy and potentially paints the city in a bad light? nope, censored. It’s so bad that i’m convinced the mods there are being paid under the table by the City.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The problem is Reddit’s CEO. Fullstop

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I hate Reddit as much as the next guy but that just sounds like an asshole mod

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

In 3 different unrelated subs, and all said to be performed as an automated action?

Also of note, I got permabanned on May 7th.

May 4th I joined Mastadon. Using the same email as my reddit email.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m gonna have to ask you to stop abusing whatever random reddit mod flagged you back then in case they might be here. Or else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They would have to hire a shitload of people to police it all along with the rest of the questionable shit on there, like jailbait or whatever other shit they turned a blind eye to until it showed up on the news

Not saying it’s right but from a business standpoint it makes sense

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Don’t they flag stuff automatically?

Not sure what they’re using on the backend, but open source LLMs that take image inputs are good now. Like, they can read garbled text from a meme and interpret it with context, easily. And this is apparently a field thats been refined over years due to the legal need for CSAM detection anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They do, but they’d still need someone to go through the flagging and check. Reddit gets away with it as it is like Facebook groups do, by offloading the moderation to users, with the admins only being roped in for ostensibly big things like ban evasion/site wide bans, or lately, if the moderators don’t toe the company line exactly.

I doubt that they would use an LLM for that. That’s very expensive and slow, especially for the volume of images that they would need to process. Existing CSAM detectors aren’t as expensive, and are faster. They basically compute a hash for the image, and compare it to known hashes for CSAM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

A shitload of people, like as many as 10!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hate to sound so salty, but its mind boggling that they would fight this so vehemently, instead of just… filtering abusive content?

I guess it’s just enshittification. Profits are their first priority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I wonder what the investors like CondΓ© Nast/Advance Publications think of this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Probably would require them to actually pay moderators! The horror!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

I’m a little surprised to hear people so willing to let the government of Ireland determine who they are allowed to hate and for what reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Because at this point, I trust the Irish government more than Reddit to make proper moderation judgements.

It’s not a high bar, and not ideal… but I feel social media’s raging internal issues have overshadowed the fear of governments worming their way inside, at least in my eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You are making such a useless point that requires minimal effort or thought. It would be better if you actually shared a tangible concern rather than providing a strawman argument meant to cause an irrational fear in people reading your comment.

For example, you could have shared which group of people you want to be a protected class and is not by Irish law; or which group of people is currently a protected class by Irish law and should not be. At least, then, you would have brought up a real concern about how the Irish government is determining hate speech; because right now, all you are doing is fear mongering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I oppose letting anyone define hate speech as a matter of principle, because even if I agree with the definition completely now, I may not continue to agree with the definition in the future. Look at what has been happening in the USA since the October 7 attack: a lot of people I had considered my political allies turned out to have beliefs I consider to be hateful, and meanwhile these people consider my own beliefs hateful. The solution is not to empower a single central authority to decide which sort of hate is allowed. It is (as it has always been) to maintain the principle of free speech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

The moved their jurisdiction to the Netherlands? In the EU? Wow. Now the GDPR can be used to really kick their butts.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

GDPR applies regardless of where headquarters are located

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Yes, but it’s easier to enforce EU regulations when the headquarters happens to be within the EU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A move from Ireland to the Netherlands doesn’t really change much in that regard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There is always the issue of β€œx applies” and β€œx is enforcable”. Think of Signal or Telegram here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Aren’t there tax benefits to incorporating in Ireland? Conventional thought would suggest that the tax/regulatory environment in the Netherlands would be less attractive? Maybe that’s wrong… I wonder what their reasons for moving were. Is that where Steve Huffman wants to build his new doomsday bunker? Gotta spread out just in case. Maybe connect it to the one in CA with a massive underwater tunnel lol clown

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They usually operate in tandem, a double dutch irish tax sandwich or whatever it is called.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh we got a bunch of leeches in Europe, Ireland is not the only one

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mmm… Serpent Road…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They would be forced to delete all messages of all deleted users

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

Dear Netherlands,

The pigboy is your problem now. Sorry not sorry.

Sincerely,

Everyone else

permalink
report
reply
68 points
*

You can almost hear the EU lawyers cracking their knuckles and quietly saying: β€œabout that user data protection.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Yeah, moving to the EU to escape regulation doesn’t seem like a smart move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nobody except himself has ever accused Steve Huffman of being smart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Um… Did you read the article? It’s about moving their EU Headquarters from Ireland to the Netherlands. GDPR applied before and after. This is specifically about Irish censorship requirements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
125 points

Why does anyone still use reddit? Why does anyone still use Twitter? Why does anyone still use Instagram?

permalink
report
reply
84 points

Reddit has an absolutely massive wealth of community knowledge. If you want to find a community for $thing or gain obscure knowledge on $thing, that’s where you go (assuming there isn’t an old forum post from before Reddit killed forums).

Twitter is where a lot of people still are. If you’re the kind of person to care what a particular person says, that’s where you probably want to be.

Instagram is used by young people who have friends on Instagram.

It isn’t a great system, but it is the system that we have today. This is why legislation compelling Meta/Twitter/whothefuckever to act in an ethical manner is important. Social media is to some extent a natural oligopoly, and unless we get extremely, extremely lucky, the fediverse will always be a niche community.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Find me easier to access niche communities and I’ll be gone from reddit. I hoped Lemmy would blow up. Instead, reddit just shrank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Find me easier to access niche communities

Have fun trying to discuss anything that isn’t about linux, american politics or reddit/amazon/elon bad!!. Lemmy is just a decentralized circle jerk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Well i guess we should have seen it coming right. The people pissed enough with Reddit to leave were most likely to be technology proficient users and bourgeois hating leftists

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah I really wish people in niche communities would just migrate over. I honestly don’t understand why they haven’t yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Because Reddit unites everyone with the same interest in a single or at worst few subreddits. Lemmy has over 9000 instances with a bunch of communities each, half of which are defederating the other half without their users even knowing. If we thought reddit search was bad, lemmy search is non-existent. I really wanted lemmy to work, but even for someone with decent knowledge about tech it was a nightmare to figure this out. The main advantage of fediverse which is the decentralization turned out to be its main disadvantage with so much fragmentation and censorship in the form of defederation…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I hoped Lemmy would blow up.

Blow up one server and three new will sprout.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

This is basically asking why anyone would live in or near a city like Los Angeles or New York City when Minot exists and has everything you could possibly need.

If you had to look up where Minot even is, you’ve proven my point.

Say what you will about whether living near the proverbial big city is worth it or not. But it cannot be denied, there is a world of experiences on offer at larger platforms that a smaller platform simply cannot provide. Network effect can be a cruel mistress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Why not Minot?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Season’s the reason!

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

A lot of stuff ONLY has viable Q&A discussion there…

As much as I love the idea of Lemmy, try finding active communities here for: MAME or any other videogame emulation… Plex… The breed of your family dog/cat… Most any sort of non-Fedi-focused brand/podcast/personality…

Yes, I can create a new community. Then I just sit in it by myself, and occasionally deal with spam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Discoverability is poor on Lemmy and isn’t helped by the low user count.

Would be nice to revisit an old idea from Newsgroups, where you could sub to gaming and see everything, or gaming.playstation.ps5 or gaming.emulation.mame or whatever for sub-communities.

But then the decentralised nature works against it there as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Because people do not care. It is that simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

These comments are so braindead, Jesus Christ.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

As someone who only recently joined Lemmy (as a result of getting booted from Reddit) it ultimately comes down to it being bigger.

You can talk regularly about series have been over for a decade. Just about any niche interest has a vibrant community. The reality is the average person doesn’t care about it selling our data, putting a fingerprint on our gear one step above spyware, it being overrun with bots, every level of administration being dominated by megalomaniacs. If you just want to look through some stuff you’re interested in while you’re bored, it serves a purpose that lemmy unfortunately can’t at it’s size.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Yeah, Reddit is not the ghost town I thought it would be after the mass exodus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t get why more people didn’t move to Lemmy or mbin

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Inertia is a bitch. That’s why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because most people did not use 3rd party apps and do not care about siteβ€²s management. Why move to someplace else if everything works great where you already are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like we had a secret (or not so secret) desire for it to crumble so we can crack a beer and say good riddance. 😁

But in the end, business mostly as usual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s still active – save the communities that got kneecapped by mods during the revolt (and sadly, most of those are now Discord-based rather than having any appreciable activity here).

The activity there now is a lot… dumber. Like much of the internet, the ratio of real people to braindead bots on Reddit is a lot different than a few years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You don’t know why someone would use a social link aggregator… and you’re lamenting about this on a social link aggregator.

Why are you here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Almost like they asked about a specific site and not the concept of link aggregators or something

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

Almost

It was still a brain-dead question, even for a rhetorical one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. Really incomprehensible why are some people amazed at some things. We’re all different, with different motives, different needs, different levels of coziness and different views on privacy etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

For Twitter it really doesn’t make sense because it has become undebatably a β€œNazi bar”, metaphorically since they aren’t an actual bar, but they still support and tolerate Nazis (and other manners of horrible people). Some people insist that it isn’t and there are β€œnormal level headed people there” but that doesn’t matter, it’s still a Nazi bar, because it accepts and tolerates Nazis. How can someone expect to not be judged for going to and hanging out in a place like that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Most people don’t care. I’m sick of hearing about Reddit, I left because I do care but I don’t want to keep hearing about my ex, you know!

We are not important, we are the minority that maybe cares about these things and that’s ok, we should live our lives the way we want to and allow others to do the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Agreed. Yes, it’s important to know what’s going on in the β€œbig” world - but I wish all of us more interested in Lemmy, the small web, and so on spent more time and energy on creating, maintaining, and enjoying what we can build/use and less lamenting, bashing, or wishing for what we want to leave behind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Exactly! It reeks of superiority; I prefer to just live my life and if people are curious about the decisions I make then I’ll try and enlighten people, but if they don’t care still then that’s ok. We can’t force people to be like us and wouldn’t want too either, because I wouldn’t want people to try and force me to go back to Reddit for instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

because their friends are there

or in reddit’s case, because they think their friends are there

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Because people dream of making it big, being viral, being an influencer with a ton of followers and money. That one second of fame is still tantalising to a lot of people.

Also a lot of these apps (not reddit, but the others like Facebook) are installed on phones by default. To many, they are just what the internet is.

Nana and grandad used to do email. Now it’s just racist rainbowflag-phobic reposting on Facebook and wondering why their grandkids that haven’t looked at FB in a decade don’t contact them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I use it for porn still

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

first Tumblr banned porn, then Reddit requires sign-in for 18+ content (I know old UI bypasses that), and now Twitter has become a walled garden as well. Bad times for gooners

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why does anyone still use chrome!

I get twitter and reddit because of the uniqueness of the platforms but chrome is just a web browser! Any other program can be used in its stead to view the same exact websites yet people continue to use it even being stubborn about it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why does anyone still use Reddit?

Some niche communities and content to repost on Lemmy

Why does anyone still use Instagram?

Friends and memes to repost on Lemmy

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Complacency

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because social networks are only as good as the people who are on them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Overall, because Lemmy is slow and boring mostly. I see headlines here and go to Reddit for the comments through the geddit crawler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I gotta disagree with you here. At least on the sub(s) that I still - on the occasion of big events - take a glance at. To me, Reddit comments are the epitome of staleness and predictability. Also, their user base seems like a bunch of 40-year-old dads that mentally peaked at 16, but keep getting more racist by the year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tbh I cant ban subs so when I crawl R/all I get mostly bots, reposts and thirst traps which sucks but there is no long term discussion threads here. Nothing like a review thread on the movies sub or music subs, where there are hundreds or thousands of views to skim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

reddit has half functioning search.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i seen a few people still use it my friend,some random people in a server,etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Maybe because they just want to???

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

What’s wrong with Instagram now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Centralized and owned by meta. Harvesting your data constantly. Ads upon ads that track you. Proprietary.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments