aka non consented circumcision is a human rights violations rule

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I literally mentioned birth defects as a medically substiated reason, phimosis being one of them. Please read.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Phimosis isn’t even a birth defect, it’s not supposed to be pulled back for an infant. There’s basically no medically justifiable reason, ever, to do this to a baby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Phimosis in infants can lead to infections to the urinary tract, discomfort and/or pain and other related issues.

Phimosis is a medical condition and needs to be addressed as such, with parents/guardians taking well informed decisions backed with medical advice.

Addressing phimosis and other issues regarding the prepuce also does not require circumcision as other procedures can be done to rectify issues.

The removal of the prepuce for non medical reasons is an unnecessary, unjustifiable, unreasonable act, already considered to some degree as genital mutilation, as it has been shown it deprives feeling from the area and thus inhibits the sexual development and enjoyment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

While I agree that most cases of phimosis would be better to wait until teenage/young adult years before intervention is considered, if it’s bad enough that their pee balloons under the foreskin, it requires surgery. However, that surgery does not require full circumcision either in babies or adolescents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Nobody takes you seriously either because you don’t even finish reading the post and then act unnecessarily rude and obnoxious afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Let’s compare this to tail-docking for dogs. There are plenty of legitimate medical reasons that a vet might dock a tail for, including the fact it can be basically impossible to heal a severe injury on one. But if you get your dogs tail docked just for the looks, that’s a shitty thing to do. That’s why where I live, it’s illegal to do it just for aesthetics.

Now, if you’re suggesting that the vast majority of circumcisions aren’t aesthetic, and are in fact a necessary preventative medical procedure. Well, firstly, we survived as a species for hundreds of thousands of years before we started doing it just fine. And secondly, you could just as easily make the argument that removing the testes is needed to prevent future cases of testicular cancer.

Oh wait, doctors do literally say and do this to Intersex babies, with literally no medical evidence to back up their claims. Then try to force a child that was born with external genitalia to grow up as a “girl” after cutting it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sorry mate, wrong community, this isn’t the circus here

permalink
report
parent
reply