143 points

At uni a friend of mine wrote a book review of the bible that began, “Not since Naked Lunch has such a dull book been saved by the constant barrage of sadomasochistic homosexual pornography.”

permalink
report
reply
50 points

I might be interested in reading the rest of that review if it’s available to read online. That’s a great opener lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Alas it was pasted onto a sheet of paper and photocopied over 20 years ago now and I doubt it was saved. I don’t remember anything else about the article, but I presume it was very undergraduate. That line was a killer though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

sadomasochistic homosexual pornography

You had my interest, but now you have my attention

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Saul when David rolls up with a bag of 200 foreskins: 😍

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

In a similar vein, famed cartoonist R Crumb did a faithful adaptation of the book of Genesis, including all the sex and violence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_Genesis_(comics)

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*

Lol

The book has been controversial, particularly for the explicit illustrations of sexual intercourse described in the text itself. In critical circles, it has drawn fire over whether and how literal the illustration job is, or should be.

It’s fine as a holy book that we should all treat as the literal word of god, but don’t you dare draw those raunchy sex scenes from my holy book

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

had no idea about this, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
8 points

Gyat damn she is thick af.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

ironically there’s an entire book about genocide of the human race by god too

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What’s that one

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Took me a second because I was focused on Genesis and Exodus, but it’s got to be Revelations, right?

Good news is that’s just a fan fiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Revelations works too but specifically I meant the Noah’s Ark story :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Makes me think of my favorite verse to quote in arguments: Pslam 137:9 - Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks (NIV).

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Omfg

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Context is important. It’s a song of imagined - and not executed - revenge. The writer is wishing that what happened to their kids also happened to the invaders kids. The Babylonians dashed Jewish kids against rocks, and the Jews didn’t respond in kind - couldn’t in fact, because the Law forbade it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The thing is, most people that will cite the bible as an argument are already taking shit out of their context, so at this point it’s just fair game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Context seems to be largely ignored when your argument sounds so great

permalink
report
parent
reply

what is NIV

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

New International Version.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

New international version I wanted to be clear on the translation I was quoting, because it can make a difference in wording and sometimes meaning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Cool that there is more murder than misogyny

permalink
report
reply
22 points

How very progressive

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Most of the misogyny is in the stuff written by Paul. Dude HATED women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Well, one of the dudes pretending to be Paul. Initial probably-actually-Paul is like “Why wouldn’t we have women in church leadership? They were leaders when we were being hunted by the Romans.”

Honestly though, I feel like there’s just not enough green tabs as a whole. Plenty of OG misogyny in the religious law sections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A true leftist of his time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s a very generous view of the old testament

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The caption is BS and the markers don’t actually correlate with the topics, even though the topics are all present in there.

And actually there’s a pretty interesting history of empowered women buried underneath the later misogynistic revisions, which is the case for both the OT and NT in separate developments.

permalink
report
parent
reply