-26 points

Fuck that. Genocide Joe has not been great. Fuck this shit

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

That’s just a side effect of being American

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

God its so fucking tone deaf to post shit like this. It’s one thing to reluctantly support Biden but to cheerlead him while he massacres thousands is beyond gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

cheerlead him while he massacres thousands

Please, lecture us about tone deafness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Biden has been a fine president, but notably failed to do a number of things that are important to me such as legalizing marijuana, codifying into law RvW, ending Citizen’s United, increasing the minimum wage, etc. I like Joe Biden, and he’s way better than the other guy, but I wouldn’t say “great”.

permalink
report
reply
112 points

The President cannot unilaterally do any of those things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

And the things he could do unilaterally (student loan forgiveness), he absolutely tried to do , but was cockblocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Absolutely. I mean, it’s utterly fascinating that people think the President can somehow overturn a Supreme Court decision (Citizens United). The civic literacy in this country is fucking awful, and it’s clear that a huge portion of our electorate doesn’t know or understand anything more complicated than a one-line soundbyte.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Same with Marijauna, one of the first things he did was call for rescheduling by the DEA who have been too busy masturbating in corners. He did, however, pardon a ton of people over weed offences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s astonishing to me the supposed number of “informed” people with their moral purity on Lemmy don’t know basic US civics. But hey trendy nicknames worked for the low intelligence maga voters no reason it doesn’t work on them. Maybe they’ll realize it when Trump takes power again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The President can’t reschedule marijuana?

edit:

The Congressional Research Service seems to think he could:

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10655

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

“Reschedule? Ok, tomorrow evening it is.”

- Dark Brandon

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not enabling genocide, so he can make up procedural nonsense to avoid doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Proceedings to add, delete, or change the schedule of a drug or other substance may be initiated by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or by petition from any interested party, including:

The manufacturer of a drug

A medical society or association

A pharmacy association

A public interest group concerned with drug abuse

A state or local government agency

An individual citizen

Not quite unilateral, but seems like he could lean a bit on Becerra and get the re/de-scheduling started. Congress handed that authority to the executive branch years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahsinclair/2024/01/18/dea-considers-rescheduling-cannabis-what-this-means-for-us-and-global-reform/?sh=1ee5279b743f

That is happening, maybe slower than any of us want ( and honestly probably time a bit to help in the election), but the rescheduling process had begun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Drug schedules are set by the FDA. The FDA is part of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Department of Health and Human Services is part of the executive branch of the US government. The executive branch is headed by Biden. Short of just waving his hand and magicking the drug classification away, there is still a lot he could do to make it legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you cant hold him accountable for not getting minimum wage increase because he can’t do it unilaterally why give him credit for things he cant do unilaterally, like the infrastructure bill? Clearly he didn’t do that unilaterally either so why should he get credit? You can’t have it both ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Railroad Union was all him. He can raise the minimum wage of federal workers, contractors, and sub contractors. He could have ended the Remain in Mexico program. He could have set the DOJ to monopoly breaking. He could have stopped supplying Israel. He could direct HUD to begin buying housing for direct rental programs…

The list goes on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

He can raise the minimum wage of federal workers, contractors, and sub contractors.

Done. Oh wait.

He could have ended the Remain in Mexico program.

Done, and confirmed by SCOTUS.

He could direct HUD to begin buying housing for direct rental programs…

Done.

So let’s rewrite your comment, given the things that you apparently didn’t know actually happened:

The Railroad Union was all him. He raised the minimum wage of federal workers, contractors, and sub contractors. He ended the Remain in Mexico program. He could have set the DOJ to monopoly breaking. He could have stopped supplying Israel. He directed HUD to begin buying housing for direct rental programs… The list goes on…

Yeah, it has a slightly different flavor when you actually…you know…pay attention to things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

On top of Edward Teach’s comment, you also raised the issue of the railroad union. Guess what?

https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

Biden did the right thing once again, and also managed to avoid a national logistics disaster. Please stop operating off of vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can’t he just sign executive action after executive action and ignore the court like Jackson did?

permalink
report
parent
reply

The executive can’t make laws. Only congress can do that. And right now that means for those things to happen, Democrats have to control the House and 60+% of the Senate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Or they have to be willing to use a simple majority to get rid of the filibuster.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They don’t have the guts because the 2024 senate election landscape doesn’t look great for Dems. Most of the purple seats that are up for reelection have democratic incumbents. Traditionally that would mean that Democrats will lose seats. They don’t want to hand republican candidates in these states the talking point of “authoritarian democrats” killing the filibuster with a 1 seat majority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t “like” him at all, but I can acknowledge that he’s done a great job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Then vote Democrat across the board. He needs a majority in both the House and Senate for some of those, and a super majority to go against the Supreme Court afaik.

Voting matters. If you want results, Biden needs the numbers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

You mean like all those other times Democrats had majorities and, checks notes, delivered milquetoast Republican bills?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You mean that one time for 3 months during Obamas term, where they were focused on trying to get Healthcare reform in? Because there’s no other time in recent history where the dems controlled both houses with a dem potus

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Joe Biden is trapped in the White House. The Republicans refuse to let him out unless he pardons Donald Trump and let him be president. He needs your help but we can help him stop the Republicans from taking over the country.

All he needs is the 16 digits on the front of your mom’s credit card, as well as the 3 digits on the back but you must hurry, he doesn’t have much time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

None of those things are the responsibility of the President.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

All those things have to be done through Congress. If he had the majority to do it and didn’t do it, that would be a good reason to hold it against him.

If we want Congress to act we need to make sure he has the House and the Senate, and best to do it is to vote in upcoming election and make your friends and family to do the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We had a majority in congress. But that majority was Democrats, so they found the no votes to maintain the status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They didn’t really, they had a majority in the House, and not in the Senate, in 2022 things reversed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was really really really hoping Gerrymandering would be a key issue for his administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He set Harris on that issue early on, which is basically code for “it’s not a priority, will probably fail, and I don’t want to be associated with failure”. Which was kind of self fulfilling, because the VP just doesn’t have the stature to strongarm anyone into a reform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Don’t forget railroad buster Biden and Israel apologist Biden.

Still better than “million American deaths due to incompetence and pushing psuedo-science” trump though, don’t get me wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Railroad Union buster… People might think he actually broke up the oligopoly on the rails.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Keep in mind, the Biden administration continued to negotiate on the unions behalf until the companies capitulated and gave sick days. The rail unions celebrated the victory and gave Biden credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The rail unions celebrated the victory and gave Biden credit.

There is a huge difference between union leaders and what they say on behalf of it’s members and the rank and file members themselves. Kneecapping rank and files power, their only power which is to withhold their labor, is not something that is celebrated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
141 points

He has delivered the largest economic recovery plan since Roosevelt, the largest infrastructure plan since Eisenhower, the most judges confirmed since Kennedy, the second-largest healthcare bill since Johnson, and the largest climate change bill in history.

permalink
report
reply
111 points

and none of it matters because the other side thinks the work of government is to do as little as possible for the people it fleeces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

And their propaganda has been so good for the last 60 years that even half the left believes it but think they’re immune to it. See motions to every thread in Lemmy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Upvotes? Oh, yeah, that tracks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The ones I know think it’s a scheme to bring minority immigrants in and pay them welfare to vote for democrats so they can “destroy us from within” and bring about a worldwide socialist government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Oh no

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I prefer a worldwide New World Order but you take what you can get.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Given the congress he has to work with, one could argue he’s been a better President than Obama was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

He’s been a better president than Obama was.

It’s not particularly close in my opinion.

I’m hella biased, but the SAVE plan and not accruing interest on student loans as long as you make payments is a huge win.

There’s no reason they couldn’t have done this under Obama…

Edit: just wanted to mention that this restructuring for student loans had absolutely nothing to do with Congress

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The SAVE plan and the rules around PSLF really do make medical school a lot more viable for people like me. Doctors get paid a pittance in residency, and the interest on medical school loans would add up really fast on the old income-driven repayment plans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

In terms of stuff leftists want, Obama overpromised and underdelivered, while Biden underpromised and overdelivered. I’m not sure he actually delivered all that much more than Obama did on an absolute scale, but when expectations ranged from “1994 crime bill guy” to “at least he’s not Trump,” pretty much any policy that manages to edge past mediocre is a pleasant surprise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Obama was generally pretty terrible. Obamacare was a disaster and about the only good policies he had were around car emissions, which were significant but still. If you factor in the amount of political capital he had in 2009 it’s sad really.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I agree too. Obama had charisma and was a great speaker, but policy wise Biden is much better.

If Obama was firmer many current problems would not exist today. But it is easier to say now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Obama had charisma and was a great speaker,

And as we’re seeing now with Biden’s poll numbers, unfortunately, that’s all that matters. Doesn’t matter how many good things you do to help people, all that matters is whether you have charisma and a good media relations team.

People are so stupid. Maybe democracy was a mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

And yet the quality of life for Americans is still declining, while the wealth gap keeps growing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would argue the quality has been improving as if late. But kind of hard to blame him for the fact that the world was gripped and massively disrupted a by a pandemic and the financial moves by the fed to stave off an even worse financial melt down led to high inflation. But we’re going in the right direction, even if it isn’t fast enough for some people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Research constantly points to things getting worse, especially for younger generations. At best you could say the rate of decline has slowed somewhat recently.

And it’s unfair to blame it on the pandemic, the trends been going on for much longer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Wages aren’t keeping up with inflation for most people. The wage increases reported are mostly driven by top earners. It isn’t moving at the bottom. Longer lines than ever at food pantries. I remember when Democrats used to at least pretend to give a shit about that stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This has been a decades long problem that he has contributed to over his entire career.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That has been a trend for decades so it’s not going to turn around overnight. He has made some big steps by expanding numerous quality of life programs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Yep, and a bunch of the things Biden supporters want to tout are making this problem worse, because his economic legislation and climate legislation and healthcare legislation and all the rest is almost entirely just throwing taxpayer money at businesses and hoping it trickles down to us somehow

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Narrator - It didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

Real wages (i.e. inflation adjusted) have been growing for the last year and are now even with what they were before covid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

In 2019 real wages were on par with what they were in 1973. That is no growth in over 50 years.

Of course things are going to go back to pre-Covid levels post-Covid. That’s not a sign that things are magically fixed. Housing and food costs are at extreme highs, the amount of people working two jobs to survive are at highs, etc. etc. CPI also lags behind on many things such as market rent.

And don’t even get me started on the generational gap, millenials, zoomers, and alphas are all far far worse off than previous generations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Congratulations you swallowed a propaganda line that wasn’t even true when they printed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Adjusted for inflation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Weird, I never see Record oil extraction on his list of accomplishments, I wonder why that is? 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Except for supporting the genocide of Gazan children, sure.

Don’t get me wrong, if my only options are a vindictive Orange wannabe dictator, and Biden, I’m still voting for Biden…but fuck, his support for Israel’s genocidal crusade is really fucking bad.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

There are a handful of US politicians who don’t support Israel. There’s too much money and regional interests to do otherwise

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I swear, it feels like it would only make sense that Mossad has something on so many of these folks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like videos on little st james island?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Guess theres only a handful of good US politicians than.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

ding ding ding

When Congress is constantly like half Republican, and then another portion of Democrats are basically neocons or populists, we’re left with a small percentage of progressives and liberals who want to actually make the country better

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

His support of Israel is consistent with American foreign policy writ large since 1947. That people want to place the ongoing genocide at his feet betrays the success of GOP and foreign propaganda, to wit: The absence of American support for Israel would not stop the genocide, and the position of the Biden administration in Israel and Gaza is the same as any other presidency, historical, hypothetical, or imaginary. That is, any US president would have the exact same policy, including Donald Trump, any other president in the last seventy-five years, and anyone who ever had a realistic chance at the Oval.

That’s because a US-Israel alliance, even in the presence of reprehensible acts by Netanyahu’s government and the IDF, is still better for the US, and arguably global stability, than any alternative. The best we can hope for, from any president, are calls for restraint and ceasefire, both of which Biden have made. Abandoning Israel as a US ally would be a disaster for the entire region, and more importantly it would make no difference whatsoever to the Palestinian people.

I don’t think the policy is morally good. But it’s rational. Criticizing Joe Biden for the genocide is like criticizing a commuter for their vehicle’s emissions. Yeah, things would be better if they were different, but Israel-Palestine isn’t a problem Joe Biden can solve in the real world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The absence of American support for Israel would not stop the genocide

I’d say cutting out hundreds of millions of dollars in weapon exports would do a hell of a lot to slow it down

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, let them continue the genocide if they must, but as an American it makes me absolutely sick to know my taxpayer dollars are funding it. Biden is perhaps the most Zionist president in American history, and is largely responsible for the current state of affairs by providing cover for Israel and preventing the UN from performing peacekeeping duties.

Stop sending them money and bombs. Not another dime until they end the occupation. Palestine belongs to Palestinians, period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is spot on. Politics is all trolley problems. Biden is the one pulling the lever and there are certainly fair criticisms to be pointed at the set of actions taken within a realpolitik approach to this, but this relationship can be stretched or stressed, not broken. If it breaks, the humanitarian crisis to follow is magnitudes worse than the current conflict.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Time will condemn your words, and you. These are evil words, it is an evil position you take. No justification exists for the support of the acute execution of genocide. Whatever crisis you prognosticate by the breaking of the US, support for Israel has other means of mitigation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

His support of Israel is consistent with American foreign policy writ large since 1947.

Israel has never been this bad during our period of close alliance, and it’s making us as Americans less safe to stand with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Holy shit, is this someone who actually understands how foreign policy works AND you’re getting upvotes? There may be hope after all.

But seriously, if you read between the lines, the Biden administration has had some of the hardest rhetoric towards Israel in decades. It sounds very minimal in a vacuum but saying things like, “we might stop sending actual weapons and only infrastructure support”, is a huge step whether anything is actually done or not. It is very much a threat. The government in Israel absolutely knows what it means as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

His support of Israel is consistent with American foreign policy writ large since 1947.

“That’s the way we’ve always done it” is a monumentally shitty justification for supporting genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Say you don’t understand political nuances without actually saying it lmfao. “Why can’t we just change things when bad stuff happens” bc brother it is a fuckton more complicated than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, Biden’s legacy is simply that he’s not Trump.

That’s a very important thing, though. I wouldn’t put it past Trump to fully pull out of Ukraine without notice for Putin if he were re-elected. Then we’d be talking about millions of dead children, and all of their parents as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Still the best president we’ve had since Obama

permalink
report
reply
8 points

And he’s not a Loser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He probably smells better too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The bar wasn’t set very high… I mean, practically anyone normal would’ve been better than Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I vote for President RuPaul

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

RandPaul: ❌

RuPaul: ✅

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Obama is the only decent president I can name since wwii

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Sounds like someone’s family wedding wasn’t droned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Underrated comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You know, one thing I haven’t been able to find was how prominent the drone program was during the Bush administration. While Obama’s admin had more drone strike kills in like 1 year than did the whole of the Bush admin, one also has to question how many of the damned things were flying and launching missile strikes with civvie casualties during the Bush admin. If anyone has info on that, I’d like to read up.

Also, more drone strikes during 45 and 46 each than 44, too. But somehow this always gets glossed over. I don’t understand that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

He’s the best president since Jimmy Carter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The guy who sold weapons to Indonesia so they could commit genocide?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments