109 points

Don’t forget this part

permalink
report
reply
52 points

yeah this bill is not about tiktok at all. they’re just using tiktok as an excuse to setup internet censorship for the future

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Yep, this is McCarthyism and the Patriot Act all over again. We’re really naive if we believe this is just about Tik Tok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

People acting more terrified at the loss of tik tok from their lives than they did during covid, while losing people from their lives.

Tik tok might as well just change their name to empathy box, because they have convinced their users that the act of watching content on empathy box makes them more moral and politically aware than the rest of us.

At the end of the day, we have to be nervous when a foreign nation has content reach to 80℅ of Americans. This foreign nation is banning Americans from accusing it of genocide while allowing an economic incentive for Americans to accuse themselves and everybody else of doing it.

Deep down, every one of us knows tik tok is a power nobody can or should be trusted with.

permalink
report
reply
48 points
*

So when are we shutting down Facebook for their 2016 targeted ad campaign specifically meant to fuck with an election?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I’m 100℅ in favor of breaking Facebook into 912 separate companies.

But not having the current political power to get that done doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it to tik tok while we still have the power to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

That’s not what they’re talking about doing. They want to sell TikTok to a US interest. Not 900 of them. This is literally a chance for Musk, Zuckerberg, Apple, and Alphabet to grab up the best short form video app for cheap.

That’s all it is. It is incredibly corrupt and the state department calls that out in other countries all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Most companies in all industries should be broken up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Don’t use TikTok, don’t really care too much either way, but watching this whole thing unfold is starting to open my eyes to the ways these companies can shape public opinion.

They’re apparently sending notifications to people to contact their reps and it seems very likely that they’re promoting content that advocates against the ban.

I’m not a fan of censorship or blocking internet services but TikTok really seems to trying to make a good case for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

This isn’t the first time a company has done that. Uber famously used pop up ads to get people to vote for a ballot proposition. Enron went so hard on PR that everyone blamed the government for people losing the pension that had already been embezzled by the executives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah but that’s okay because they’re American, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My understanding is that while rights are inalienable, meaning we recognize that Chinese citizens have the inherent right of free speech as well, not just in our direction, I’m not sure we grant free speech to mean a foreign state gets to use its technology to determine our national conversation.

I’m sure there would be teenage trans kids who through confusion ended up pro hamas, but I think tik tok could almost be accused of creating and fostering a movement that is certainly close to that very thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Wait. Are you blaming China for the anti Israel movement in politics?

That’s… Impressive. Hilarious too but also impressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

As an Australian who gets bombarded by the US point of view and agenda from their tech companies - I think America could do with an outside influence undermining the government’s point of view.

As the post points out - the US government is doing an incredibly shitty job looking out for its citizens, and if they were afraid of a propaganda machine holding them accountable and creating civil unrest it might be for the best.

It’s just a shame the power that owns the means to do that happens to be china. I wonder if things will return to normal once the citizens pack away the guillotine

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Undermining the US government’s point of view is one thing, but the argument could be made they are undermining your viewpoint more than the US government’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh for sure. I guess I despair because I don’t see a way out of the bullshit without civil unrest, but I think we have all grown weak and soft in the middle and are just willing to take it. I’m not sure it’s possible anymore and feel like the human race as a whole are just becoming slaves.

I used to think the USA at least had a semblance of justice and fairness especially compared to China, but I think it really is just every man for themselves now and greed is all that matters.

It’s not much better here in Australia either. There is no sense of community, or trying to build a better society. It’s almost applauded to be corrupt and selfish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The government does a shitty job, but it is representative. American culture is dominated by billionaire worship, consumerism, and greed. We shouldn’t be so surprised when our elected officials share our values.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Deep down, every one of us knows tik tok is a power nobody can or should be trusted with.

I disagreed with you up until this point. You’re exactly right about this.

The problem is that nobody should have this kind of power. But our government thinks this kind of power is just fine as long as it’s a US company they can control.

If nobody should have this power than nobody should have this power. Not China. Not Musk. Not Zuckerberg. NOBODY.

But we have a feckless, ineffective government written by racists 250 years ago and this is literally all they can do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

American social media companies are also controlled by foreign powers. I have no interests in common with the ultra wealthy and massive corporations that control this country. They are just as foreign to me as anyone in another country. I trust them less than I trust TikToc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Right, but if you know all of them can’t be trusted than the only logical thing to do is leave them behind, all of them.

Have you done so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Actually, yes. The only exception would be YouTube, but I don’t let the algorithm tell me what to watch. I have a handful of channels I follow, and sometimes look up a howto video.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I am much less concerned about foreign news reaching the American people than the outright lies being spread in the American news without people batting an eye. And the fact that a foreign government (Israel) literally owns our government.

Oh so a chinese news source pointed this out to the youth? Good. It shows that we are so sick of not being able to trust OUR news that we’re looking elsewhere. Banning TikTok won’t fix that. I won’t go back to CNN or Fox if you take away that option. I’ll continue to look elsewhere

Who’s next? Al Jazerra? The hindustan times? The BBC?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are you actually fucking insane? How does the Israeli government literally own the US government? That’s not even true figuratively. What the fuck are you saying

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So glad to see this argument here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

They don’t actually want to get rid of tiktok. They just want it to be owned by a consortium of American billionaires so they can influence public policy more easily.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

That is a just cause in theory

Except billionaires aren’t loyal to any accepted borders

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Part of me would rather have it with capitalistic sociopaths that want to extract my money rather than an authoritarian government that is provably responsible for (multiple?) genocide(s). Like, in a perfect world, there’s a better system, but at least our government still, in theory, can control the businesses within our country. They won’t though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

an authoritarian government that is provably responsible for (multiple?) genocide(s)

Yes, US has a history of it. As a matter of fact, it was built on a genocide of the native population and is currently contributing to one in the middle ea

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Whataboutism. One, in theory, I have a say for/against(in theory) another I don’t. It isn’t hard. But, yes, US bAd. Good job. Anything to actually add?

You don’t have to tell me about the murders of my ancestors.

Also, to follow up, the US government doesn’t control social media here, unlike wherever your bot farm is out of. Which is why your whataboutism really falls flat, cause one media company is controlled by an authoritarian government currently eradicating Uighurs and the other is owned by Zuck, who’s trying to idk honestly, drown in money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

Our two parties that refuse to address relevant problems:

Skill issue

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Isn’t Zoom supposed to be basically Chinese spyware too? Why are they trying to ban TikTok and not Zoom?

Rhetoical question. I know why. Zoom helps funnel more money to shareholders.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Because the bill lets them ban anything that they want, not just TikTok. All the have to do is assert “foreign influence” and they can block, censor, or force sale to “American interests”.

Basically these motherfuckers are doing their best to make it so you only see, hear, and read what they want. And if that’s not actually their intent, they’re leaving the door wide open for the next guy to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And if the current guy doesn’t get his shit together, that next guy is going to be the former guy and then the entire world’s fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not true. They have to show that the company is headquartered in or owned by the “sensitive country”.

Giant loophole for American Data vendors and marketers to sell data and targeted advertising to China. (Which is just an algorithm by a different name.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because the bill lets them ban anything that they want, not just TikTok. All the have to do is assert “foreign influence” and they can block, censor, or force sale to “American interests”.

How long until this is used against a Fediverse instance?

permalink
report
parent
reply