Important context: This was an instance of a crowd crush caused by poor crowd control.

edit: action has now been taken against the offending comment :)

(also some of you guys in the comments here have been yoinked by mods too… just be nice? this post was not an invitation to test out your boundaries)

by opening this spoiler you acknowledge that brigading and harrassment are against the rules

link to post in question: https://lemmy.world/comment/10965360

85 points

Is expressing atheist beliefs inherently anti-religious?

Seems like a bad cope to me

permalink
report
reply
88 points
*

No, but “I may die in a stupid way (but not as stupid as these religious people who were trampled to death because of a dust storm)” is anti-religious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I understand your point

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You haven’t seen the thread of comments by flying squid on the topic of taking nude pictures of babies and sharing them with people

I’ll grab the link and come back and edit my comment

https://lemmy.world/comment/10906808

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lmao the people there saying taking pics of your baby without clothes counts as child porn

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Ah yes, please do complain about it in a community that has nothing to do with it!

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

😊

for those interested i am working on it :) trying to figure something out because i also recognize this is suboptimal

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah yes, please do complain about it in a community that has nothing to do with it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Damn, this post left out some really crucial context. I assumed the comment was left in response to someone martyring themselves, probably after having killed others in the name of their sky fairy. And in that context I’d have backed them 100% in what they were saying about it.

But yeah, your reply there said it better than anyone could. The comment was completely out of place and inappropriate.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Ooh! What context can I add? Obviously I want to make this post as effective as possible and don’t want to mislead folks but I recognize I have proximity bias.

Thanks :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I think they’re talking about the context of it being a crowd crush.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah 100% it’s that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I mean… it does say “Crush” in the original title. But not everyone knows what that means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

Something that always gets me is when people lump in anti-religion with these others. Reglion in any country with freedom of religion is a choice, these other things are not. Someone doesn’t choose to be a particular ethnic group. Someone doesn’t choose to be disabled. People don’t choose to be gay or have gender dysphoria People do choose to believe in things that I think are ridiculous and saying that I cannot call that out is just religious people saying you can’t call them out. If you can tell me I am burning in hell because I don’t believe in your pie man in the sky then I can tell you that you are stupid for believing in a pie man in the sky and comment on absurd actions that are caused by those beliefs.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

telling someone they are going to burn in hell for their religion/atheism would also be anti-religious and should be treated as such :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah nah.

You don’t tell them they’re stupid for faith. You point out that the bullshit they’re spouting is explicitly stated by their pie man in the sky to be the real express road straight to hell. Much more fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Like for instance every conservative Christian politician who was piously sworn in on the Bible, despite Jesus himself saying not to swear by anything and calling the practice demonic. By their own stated belief system they are inaugurating their public office with a satanic ritual.

This isn’t some obscure passage either, it’s in the Sermon on the Mount, one of the most famous scenes in the entire Bible. Anyone who swears on the Bible in any capacity clearly doesn’t take it seriously enough to know anything about what it says.

And the alternative given to swearing oaths is just like… idk, maybe be honest in general, guys?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

based and yet human decency pilled

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

People do choose to believe in things that I think are ridiculous and saying that I cannot call that out is just religious people saying you can’t call them out.

And what value does your calling them out add to the discussion? Does it lead to an interesting nuanced conversation? Or is it immediately just people insulting each other while saying nothing other than “you’re wrong”?

If it never leads to useful or interesting discussion and only leads to flame wars and arguments then it should be banned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To the extent of “what does calling out anyone for anything lead to an interesting nuanced discussion” so should we ban calling people out?

Ultimately it’s ambiguous and we need to draw a line in the sand somewhere, but it’s reasonable for people to disagree where to draw that line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Calling out irrational religious belief helps remove that pollution from the zeitgeist. It helps take damaging, incorrect beliefs out of important decision-making processes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Except, it often isn’t a choice? Especially for women? Most people are born with their religion chosen for them. There are also clearly deeply ingrained universal drives that push humans to religious beliefs as well. Otherwise we wouldn’t see them across civilisations on every continent, from antiquity to the modern day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

No such rules in this one – your god is a lie sold to castrate and incapacitate you.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Does that mean you deserve to die in a crowd crush, something not at all unique to religious gatherings?

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

r/atheism and its consequences have been disastrous to the traditional practice of being a decent human being online

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Riiiiiiiight it’s atheists that are the problem. Not just shitty people who happen to be atheist…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

While not impossible elsewhere. Extremely large crush killings like this happen with alarming regularity at religious events.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Concerts and sporting events have rules and regulations to prevent this nowadays. Guess who cries “persecution” when you try the same for them.

Also, a lot of these events are in the poorer countries, where these regulations don’t exist.

And also because, apparently, god doesn’t want to rescue these people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No it does not mean that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

No such rules in this one

Though neither specifically mention religion, here are the rules for c/196 and lemmy.blahaj.zone that may cover this case:

196 rules:

lemmy.blahaj.zone’s guidelines:

lemmy.blahaj.zone’s TOS:

In addition, lemmy.blahaj.zone’s TOS states that they must follow the laws of Australia, which may have legislation regarding this issue:

Edit: replaced references from lemmy.world’s TOS, I got the instance wrong, my bad! - Also replaced non-image links with archive.org links for posterity (image links have been archived, but they have not been replaced for embedding reasons)

initial version of the comment

No such rules in this one

Though neither specifically mention religion, here are the rules for c/196 and lemmy.world that may cover this case:

196 rules:

lemmy.world TOS:

In addition, lemmy.world’s TOS states that they must follow the laws of the below three countries, which may have laws regarding this issue:

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I read that and don’t see how it’s relevant in this case. I’m simply telling the truth. Invest your tithe into a retirement account and call it a day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You cannot be telling the truth because not all gods have the same rules. Also no common gods demand castration or incapacitation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

neither of you or c/196 are from lemmy.world

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

…that’s embarrassing, I must’ve read it in the post and assumed that this community was on that instance, I’ll correct it in a moment.

Edit: fixed!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

user was banned for this comment 🙃

permalink
report
parent
reply