This stupid topic again

But sure

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
146 points

I’d vote for AOC, tbh

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*

Bernie is too old, she’d be my top pick in Congress by far.

But the Party probably wants to go maximum hail corporate neoliberal, especially when there isn’t a pesky primary to deal with, because thats what they’re paid to do.

You know, someone who will come to continue to protect our beloved economy… from our society and the needs of our people. Better than fascism, but just extending the meaningless subsistence in service to the owner class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

AOC isn’t even in the conversation though. I think she’d face fierce opposition to even getting the nomination. She’s a pretty divisive figure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

She’s a pretty divisive figure.

Not for anything she does, AFAICT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Republicans are terrified of her. She’s young, attractive, charismatic, outspoken, and intelligent to say nothing of her being a woman of color. They are giving her the full Hillary treatment. It seems like she’ll be a bit harder for them to tarnish that way, but not for lack of trying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I should be clear I’m talking about public perception here, not my personal opinions or any assessment of her policies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

When she voted to disallow train workers striking was pretty disheartening. Who’d expect someone so pro-worker to knock the teeth out of a union.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

The fact that she’s a conservative bogeyman is kind of besides the point. The neoliberal, corporate-friendly leadership of the DNC would NEVER let her get close to the nomination. They did the same thing to Bernie 8 and 4 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s exactly what I was referring to.

To be clear, the Democratic leadership is not all powerful. The people can push through a nominee leadership hates if we unite. But given the nature of this nomination process, party leaders have an exceptional amount of power this year, and the people have very little.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

She’s a “radical” to centrists

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“Centrists”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Wha…what do you mean not in the conversation, you are literally conversing with someone about her, on a front page post about her. She is popular, and no presidential candidate has ever not been divisive. Not being trump is divisive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The conversation among those who will decide the nominee. I’ve not heard anyone seriously discuss this outside of online forums.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

not in the conversation, you are literally conversing

  1. big-c Conversation
  2. a comma is not a colon
  3. there are other adverbs
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So what if she’s divisive? Trumps running mate called him hitler at one point. No one wanted Trump, he came in and won the voters hearts with his vision, grotesque as it may be for other people. People want certainty and vision in uncertain times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Narrowly and due to lies, intimidation, and structural advantages the right has in this country. Wouldn’t work for the left.

Besides, I was just saying that we the people aren’t really making this decision, and the ones that are won’t pick AOC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

@LibertyLizard @pearsaltchocolatebar
Lol, it’s what happens when you speak truth to power.
I’d vote for her because of a myriad of reasons though.
She is the future of the party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe maybe not but there’s 0 chance she’ll be the nominee this year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

She gets labeled as “divisive” because she’s a woman and she’s not a centrist. Name one woman who gets listed as a potential candidate and isn’t under this same garbage rhetoric.

To be clear, women can and should still be scrutinized, but not to the point where the only woman who would be a great presidential candidate is the most perfect candidate who ever lived.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points
*

She’s not old enough anyway, need to be 35 to be president, she’s 34

Downvoted for stating facts lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Hmm interesting, looks like she turns 35 in October. I’m assuming you have to be of age to run? Or is it to be elected? I’m actually not sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You also can’t be president if you participated in an insurrection after taking an oath, but here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She IS old enough. She will be 35 before inauguration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Why is he being downvoted for providing the correct answer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

yeah but the democratic party would rather lose the election than nominate her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

AOC is standing with Biden, as is Bernie Sanders.

Fucking Fox and CNN are calling for Biden to step down.

That doesn’t seem strange to you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

not at all. Bernie and AOC are already hated by their party and they have no pull. openly calling for him to step down is not going to help anything, if not have an adverse effect. with biden insisting on staying all they can do is try to appeal to their progressive base who doesn’t like biden at all to vote for him because they know biden will depress the vote.

also i saw people on fox defending biden against these calls. it was basically “just let him run again dude, is he loses TFG gets to be president for 4 years then he’s gone forever… you can’t lose ONE election???” it was ridiculously desperate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

And Katy Porter

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I don’t want AOC to run yet. She’s got a long political career ahead of her and folks tend to bow out of politics after they’re president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

She would be an amazing elder statesperson after her time in office. I hope to some day see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Bruh, why are you getting excited about the idea of crusty old genocidal American beaurocrats who inevitably sell out? No US senator is a friend of mine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

We should bring back the idea of a former president running for senator. Show the world that the President isn’t any more special than Congress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just not anyone old enough to collect social security. We should also bring back the idea that retirement means actually not working anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Is there any reason she couldn’t serve a different position after 2 terms as president?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No reason, it’s just the way things tend to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s she old enough right now? Can she be a candidate at 34 if she will be 35 before Jan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Yes. The age requirement is for serving, not for running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

She’s 35 on October 13th. Fully qualified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

She’d be the best populist candidate, since Bernie is too close in age to Biden. I also think she could really drum up support with her charisma. The only way to fight a populist like Trump is with another populist. Remember how far Bernie got with his campaigns that refused to take corporate money?

Honestly, the only people that would get in her way are the same DINO Democrats who didn’t get behind Bernie. Funny how the progressives in the Democratic party are always the ones who are told to compromise and vote for the centrist and never the other way around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I don’t think she could win even though I think she’s perfect. The US isn’t ready for a woman president, and a non-white one on top of that. I think that’d be pretty cool if Adam Schiff ran with her as his VP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Why? Do you loathe organized labor and want to see them crushed to maximize corporate profits?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

She’s done far more good than bad. This kind of purity testing is why the left in this country is so weak.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 437K

    Comments