And the image/chat was stolen from tumblr, I think?

74 points

Reminder that there are only around 750 billionaires in the US. We can eat them.

Or tax them to hell like they did in the 50s I guess. But I prefer the eating thing.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

I think billionaires would typically rather get eaten than lose their gains. Hence the willingness to risk human extinction over number not go up so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Ide rather ax them than tax them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

As much as I can appreciate a good revenge fantasy, as a society we should refrain from driving people to suffer, including as a form of retributive justice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Por que no los dos

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

One of the things that I thought of to help with this problem is, like, what if we figured out how much it costs to meet like all the basics in life - a house (not a rental!), food, soda, internet, heat/hot water - all that stuff. Then add some more, so that people could do nice stuff and enjoy their lives, save for retirement, go on vacations, etc.

Then - now here’s the crazy part - we make a law requiring that everyone in the country needs to be paid at least that much money. It would be like a “Floor Wage,” or, like, a “Minimum Salary.”

If the increase in the cost of doing business didn’t eliminate billionaires altogether, I bet people would at least stop giving a shit about billionaires and their gold piles because the rest of us aren’t living in debt while they build yachts for their yachts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

The police are thier private security force…

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Where’s the button I can press to project this comment onto the moon

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

What can you realistically steal that isn’t worth peanuts to them? You could take a car or some jewelry or maybe destroy a building, but their massive hoards are mostly in these intangible things called shares. It only exists on record and it only has value to those who are similarly greedy.

Their life, on the other hand… 🤔

permalink
report
reply
22 points

New rule, billionaires must maintain a horde of gold and jewels worth at least 100 million at all times. If it gets stolen they have to make a new one. Anyone can try to steal it, but the billionaires can set lethal traps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I suspect the most evil rich assholes would set up explosive traps on everything shiny, so that as soon as you pull it or whatever, it blows up. To add insult to injury, you’ll also have to hear a sermon about how greed is bad and evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

ironic, isnt it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s way easier, just throw stuff at anything you want to take

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bring in the guilotines!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Sometimes I think it’d be funny if there were a single billionaire on Lemmy watching us make fun of them. Google says there are like 2600 billionaires in the world. I imagine that’s pretty unlikely, tho.

But hey - if there are zero billionaires on lemmy, that means we have ourselves a billionaire-free zone!

permalink
report
reply

You wonder if Zuckerbot 9000 uses Threads? 🤔

He won’t know we’re talking shit if everyone defederates. 😌

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Promise you cuckerberg is full of himself enough he’s anywhere there are naysayers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Even if they aren’t on lemmy you can bet they follow some anti-capitalist group somewhere, whether it be on reddit or mastodon or somewhere else. It’s definitely a strategy for some rich people to keep an eye on their enemies and what the population say about them

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You know, it’s kind of like this with land. Laws around Adverse Possession (Squatter’s Rights) are basically the legal framework for taking possession of land when someone has so much land or are so absentee that you can use it without them noticing. Generally, if you you can use their land openly and they don’t challenge you, after a set period it’s yours.

Don’t know how this would work with money, but it’s interesting that you can legally take someone’s property if they have too much to manage it properly and you need it.

permalink
report
reply