93 points
*

Between “Democrats say ‘Vote’” and “Democrats do nothing to fight back,” they didn’t vote in 2016.

This Supreme Court is a result of that inaction.

Congratulations on demonstrating how voter abstention hands the government to Republicans.

Let’s not do that any more.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

We had 8 good years before that and didn’t set up any protections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

During the last year of that, Obama was denied the ability to nominate a Supreme Court Justice on an Election Year. Then, Trump got 2 nominees appointed to the SCOTUS, one of which was on an election year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Denied as in dems were unable to or chose not to?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

You had the first 2 years of Obama. Obama’s thanks for the ACA was voters not showing up and losing the house of representatives for year 3 and 4. And again for year 5 and 6. And then both the house and Senate in years 7 and 8. So no you didn’t have 8 years with Obama, you had 2 years with Obama because voters did not show up. Congress is what passes laws and has power. They even shut down the freaking government under Obama.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

With a heavily divided legislature that only just passed the ACA before it exploded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Only Congress can increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. We had two years of congressional majority in the last twenty. They focused on healthcare.

How could they have possibly predicted that they’d need to expand and pack the Supreme Court to prevent the next President from becoming a dictator?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They focused on healthcare.

And they gave us Romneycare

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

4 years, or 3 because of Scott Brown. But we just had 2 years. And Obama had 1 year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

More people (as a percentage of the eligible voting population) voted in 2016 than 2012, and more in 2020 than in 2016.

Finger wagging at people for criticizing the current ruling party (which is sending weapons to a country that is using them to commit genocide) instead of recognizing that we live in an undemocratic system is taking it out on the wrong people. Clinton literally won more votes in the election you’re saying people didn’t vote hard enough in. It’s spitting in the face of everyone whose votes were shat on by the Electoral College to turn around and blame the people who were disenfranchised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No one is finger wagging for criticizing. They’re being chastised because they whining to everyone how they’re refusing to vote.

Criticize the fuck out of him. I don’t see anyone giving a shit about that-

FUCKING VOTE ANYWAY.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Who’s saying they’re refusing to vote?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

FUCKING VOTE ANYWAY.

the really makes me feel like voting, y’know? that really makes me feel like I should go out and vote. that seems like a good strategy

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I get your point, but only 48% of registered Democrats voted in 2016. 25% were abstention due to dislike of the candidate.

Unfortunately, more Democrats need to vote than Republicans, because of the disproportionate weight of Republican states’ electoral votes.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/06/01/dislike-of-candidates-or-campaign-issues-was-most-common-reason-for-not-voting-in-2016/

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m not seeing where in those links it says only 48% of registered Democrats voted? If I’m missing it please point it out. The overall turnout was about 60% of eligible voters, so Democrats pulling in less than that and STILL getting more votes would be shocking.

Getting angry at voters for not voting hard enough after turnout increases every election cycle should illustrate that yelling at people to vote harder isn’t a solution, it’s a stopgap. It doesn’t change that it’s an intentionally undemocratic system, and it doesn’t prevent the exact same “the person with less votes wins” result from happening again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

25% were abstention due to dislike of the candidate.

Sounds like the problem is with who the DMC puts up, then. If 25% of your own team refuse to participate you’ve got s fucking problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Run better candidates to get more votes, it really is that simple. Blaming the voters just makes you look like a tool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Mitch McConnell specifically refused to allow Obama to appoint a justice while there was an election going on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s true. Had Obama appointed a Justice we’d just have 5-4 rulings instead of the 6-3 we have now. Trump’s immunity would still have passed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not just voter abstention, but ineffective voting too. Voting 3rd in this election is a surefire way to get trump back in office. If you wanted to stick it to Biden and get someone else, your chance was 4 years ago during the primary.

You’re not voting Biden because you like him, you’re voting Biden because you want to be able to vote for someone else in 2028. That is literally what is at stake here, and it can’t be said loud enough or often enough.

Before the “real left” quisling trolls respond, please tell us two things… Who is the 3rd party candidate you are supporting instead? What are their chances of winning this election?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

your chance was 4 years ago during the primary.

I’m sorry I didn’t realize we elected presidents for 8 year terms?

Edit- just preserving this quote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

Biden is very much the Democrat presumptive nominee. The time to select someone else was before he was President. The acting president is usually the nominee for their respective party. Also note that the DNC primary nomination is not the presidency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Donald Trump lost the popular vote and was illegitimately placed into power by the broken electoral college system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’re half right. He won due to the Electoral College, but it was unfortunately legitimate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It was legitimate in the same way that a dictator’s rule over their people is legitimate or hangings for blasphemy are legitimate. It may be technically written on a piece of paper somewhere, but someone who got less votes becoming president over someone who got more is not representative of a genuinely legitimate democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Whatever the Supreme Court says is legitimate” is a different sort than “systems that don’t deviate from serving their purpose are legitimate”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well said, but sadly they are a lot of people here that don’t care. Which is ironic, considering the meme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

This Supreme Court is a direct result of Ruth Bader Ginsberg refusing to retire because ???.

Thanks again DNC. Couldn’t have done a worse job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Don’t bring up reality.

Blame Republicans for the Democrats forcing the Supreme Court to be used as a voting carrot.

It’s all the lefties fault that they didn’t vote for corporate overlord Hillary Clinton.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Abby Martin has something to say about that …

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C82jgZOyEtU/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s great. She’s an idealist. How do we abolish the Supreme Court when we can’t even get congressional majority for more than two years every twenty?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

AOC Says She’ll File Articles Of Impeachment Amid SCOTUS ‘Corruption Crisis’

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s threat of impeachment comes after the court ruled on Trump’s immunity argument.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-impeachment-supreme-court_n_6682dd0fe4b05d5a5eb2d70e

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Right. Voting third party truly is trying nothing, since we already know it’s pissing in the wind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

No you don’t understand voting is doing nothing and not voting is a heroic action worthy of Stalin himself

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

quick reminder: Democrats have had control of house, senate, white house exactly 4 months of the last 44 years. There’s been little opportunity for the ‘fight back’ part where they fight for democracy when most of their time is undoing the absolute worst of the fascists’ hate-ball of regulations. THAT’s the exhausting part.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

For how long has this trifecta been under fascist control? Because it seems like fascists act with impunity and unlimited power as soon as they control one institution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Because they don’t care about the rules, but they know the other side does. Whenever they act, they defend not their actions, but the process by which they were allowed to do them. If fascists break the rules, liberals can only request that the rules be followed. If they follow the rules, put on a tie and speak like an academic, liberals can only trust that their ideas will be voted against. In either case, they don’t know how to call a fascist a fascist, and they don’t know how to fight fascism within the current ruleset, and they never will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You can count by going to party division websites for the house and senate. Then cross reference with the presidency. For what it’s worth, 4 months in 44 years is hilarious and a lie. We just had 2 years 2020-2022 with Democrats in a trifecta.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

There’s also the fact that even when they have absolute control by the numbers, reality doesn’t really reflect that; The democrat party is not united, and is full of politicians who will refuse to follow the party line unless the party bends over backwards for them.

“Oh, you want me to vote to stop fascism? Sure, I’ll be happy to do that, as long as you add funding for a brand new bridge in my home state.” Repeat ad nauseam until you have a horribly bloated bill that nobody actually wants to vote for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh, you want me to vote to stop fascism?

The real joke of the Democratic Party is running Coal Baron Joe Manchin to replace former KKK member Robert Byrd, on the grounds that only these two people can keep the US Senate free of fascism.

Meanwhile, you’ve got guys like Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley glad-handing J6ers minutes before they storm the capital, and Biden’s AG just kinda shrugs and says “Nothin’ we can do! There’s not a single law on the books that makes conspiring to overthrow the federal government illegal.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“Nothin’ we can do! There’s not a single law on the books that makes conspiring to overthrow the federal government illegal.”

Funny thing is as soon as you or I plan that and they smell any hint of socialism/leftism in our language suddenly they’ll have 35287253381 laws that they’ll throw all of at us for a combined prison sentence that’s longer than the eventual heat death of the universe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

In a potential future where Democrats own 100% of the senate, and nobody sane is voting GOP, it’s also possible for third party candidates to make progress in elections since no one has fear of a batshit lunatic getting into office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

In a potential future where Democrats own 100% of the senate

it’s also possible for third party candidates to make progress in elections

Once Democrats control 100% of the Senate, we can finally run a Green Party candidate in the brightest blue state who will lose to the incumbent Democrat 40/60 instead of 5/42/57. But not one minute before! You don’t want to risk a Republican winning in Massachusetts, New York, Minnesota, or California, do you?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You say this like it’s satire, but literally yes. We lost the House because we let Republicans win in New York.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Repuglicans still win in California at the lower levels, because local, and possibly state assembly, elections are run NPP. This means the candidates don’t officially run for any party. I’m pretty sure the Repuglicans passed that when they realized that an R by your name is a death sentence out here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Okay, sorry, 93% is also an acceptable number.

But like, 7% Republican votership is still…weird. And unexpected. Given that that party has contributed absolutely nothing but lies and murderers.

If a hungry man is hanging from a rope over a pit of lava, I am not starving him by keeping food on my side of the pit, I am prioritizing getting him off the rope and away from the dangerous situation first, before addressing equity issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It is fairly rare for either party to control Congress and the executive for long, so I’m not sure if that’s exactly the main pitfall we’ve run into.

I think this is mostly an unforced error on the part of neoliberalism, specifically 3rd way political ideology. In the 80s and 90s 3rd way politics grew as an idea to work around congressional gridlock.

Basically, the democratic party figured they would work across the aisle with moderate Republicans on policy they could both agree on. Hoping that this would show the American population that they were the party that could get things done.

This worked in part, Bill Clinton the main architect of American 3rd way movement became very popular. However, it had two repercussions that we are still dealing with today. It gave the policy initiative to the Republican party, allowing them to be the directors of this across aisle cooperation. It also drastically shifted the democratic party to the right.

If the DNC is rating Congress members based on criteria of Third way ideology, then the members most willing to cooperate with moderate Republicans are going to fill leadership positions. Which is why the DNC leadership is currently full of center right senior citizens conditioned to bending backwards to the whims of Republican economic policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think this is mostly an unforced error on the part of neoliberalism, specifically 3rd way political ideology. In the 80s and 90s 3rd way politics grew as an idea to work around congressional gridlock.

I agree with this, and would also point to the same thing happening all over the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Third Way was originally a think tank architected by Wall Street for the sole purpose of committing ideological false flag operations and grossly misrepresenting academic findings for the benefit of their corporate overlords. They once released a study under a headline that basically stated that because of Democrat economic policies, the gender wage was falling. And they were technically right. It was falling. It was falling because men were getting paid less and women were making the same amount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

finally, actual political analysis. on this website it’s like finding a drop of water on the moon, or something, hoo lee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, tolerance for valid self criticism in politics is dead. The only thing people want to hear is full throated support and validation. Anything else is automatically labeled as extremism in one direction nor another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Democrats have had control of house, senate, white house exactly 4 months of the last 44 years.

Democrats: “We only have 60 votes in the Senate! That’s not enough to pass anything!”

Republicans: “The Senate minority will filibuster the debt ceiling bill unless you extend the Bush tax cuts, double border spending, and add birth control pills to the Schedule I drug registry.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Breaking things is a thousand times easier than fixing them. It’s easy for Republicans to threaten to break the government unless they get what they want, because it’s a win-win scenario for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m gonna go ahead and ask the obvious question: if it’s so effective when the Republicans do it, then…you can fill in the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The Democrats had a two year period, 2020-2022. GTFO out your lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They’re talking about a supermajority where Republicans can’t stop them. Every other time we’ve been stopped by Republicans or Democrats working as Republicans (Manchin and Sinema) 2020-2022 we had a razor thin margin that Manchin and Sinema shat all over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

The filibuster isn’t a law or Constitutional requirement. It’s a self imposed rule they could have removed at any time. In fact the Constitution only requires a simple majority for anything it doesn’t specifically mention needing a larger number.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The Repuglicans controlled the House of Representatives during that time. And still control the house. You are lying to yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Here you go. There’s helpful websites if you have trouble remembering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

maybe because neoliberalism is not the right tool to fight back against fascism

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

But without neoliberalism, who will protect us from the Far-Left Authoritarian Tankies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

But without neoliberalism, who will protect us from the Far-Left Authoritarian Tankies? being able to live happily on a single income!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Having to work 3 jobs to scrape by is a small price to pay for corporations to further consolidate our economy into the pockets of like 10-20 people.

Anything less is tankie, now shut up and go find a 4th job commie!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wierdos on lemmy not bringing up tankies in conversations that have nothing to do with them challenge level impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Any anti-authoritarian ideology, especially some of the other far-left ones like libertarian communism, anarchism, etc. It’s not a world with only fascists, tankies, and neoliberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

libertarian communism, anarchism, etc

Famous for their large, robust, and enduring governing institutions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are these “tankies” in the room with you now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is Lemmy, so, yeah, pretty much all over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“There’s no such thing as tankies” is the weirdest doublethink propaganda I’ve seen in a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The leftist fifth columnist menace is the single greatest threat to American freedom and liberty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

To my American friends: Please don’t give up hope yet! As the GOP is very closely communicating with Fidesz, they’re banking on activist burnout. They want to break you, so you not only won’t do anymore activism, but to maybe even join them finally in the hopes of getting something from them finally. After the next Trump victory, they’ll likely also copy one another thing from Hungary, namely the firing of leftists, to force them to convert to conservatism.

permalink
report
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 92K

    Comments